RSNA 2005 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2005


SSK17-08

Polyp Enhancement Scheme for Improved Detection of Colonic Polyps in CT Colonography

Scientific Papers

Presented on November 30, 2005
Presented as part of SSK17: Physics (Computer-aided Detection with Colonography)

Participants

Ender Konukoglu BS, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Burak Acar PhD, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
David Seungwon Paik PhD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Christopher Frederick Beaulieu MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Sandy Napel PhD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

PURPOSE

To develop a polyp enhancement scheme that would improve the performance of the majority of previously proposed CAD algorithm for CTC that rely on the assumption that polyps are approximately spherical protruding structures.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

The underlying idea is to use the Level-Set (LS) based interface (colon wall) propagation techniques to suppress the polyp necks while inflating the polyp apex. LS based interface propagation along the surface normal direction according to a nonlinear speed function sensitive to the surface differential characteristics is used. A nonlinear function of the surface principal curvatures is proposed for speed calculations. The method is evaluated in conjunction with the previously proposed Surface Normal Overlap (SNO) algorithm on a polyp-rich real patient dataset acquired from a 56 year-old female (supine position, 4 slice multidetector CT, 2.5 mm sections, 1.25 mm intervals) containing a total of 47 polyps. For the size categories of > 5 mm and > 8 mm, there were 31 and 7 polyps, respectively, all confirmed by fiber-optic colonoscopy. We compared the detection performance of SNO alone and SNO after polyp enhancement with level-sets (PELS), using the FROC curves. The gold standard was set by an expert radiologist who examined the 3D data and marked the polyp centers using a custom-built software.

RESULTS

Both the SNO and PELS+SNO reached 7/7 sensitivity for polyps >8mm in diameter. SNO alone had 107 false positives (FPs) where as PELS+SNO had 24 FPs. SNO and PELS+SNO had 20 versus 8 FPs at 6/7 sensitivity for the same set of polyps, respectively. Considering all polyps with diameter >5mm, SNO and PELS+SNO had 368 vs 49 FPs at 17/31 sensitivity. Maximum sensitivities were 17/31 and 23/31 for SNO and PELS+SNO respectively.

CONCLUSION

Built-in polyp enhancement is a new approach to CAD for CTC. The proposed PELS algorithm had promising results in terms of boosting the performance of SNO polyp detector. It is expected to enhance the performance of most of the other detectors as well. Larger datasets are required for more reliable assessment of PELS.

DISCLOSURE

This work was in part supported by TUBITAK KARIYER-DRESS (104E035), NIH (1R01 CA72023) and Bogazici Univ. Research Funds

Cite This Abstract

Konukoglu, E, Acar, B, Paik, D, Beaulieu, C, Napel, S, Polyp Enhancement Scheme for Improved Detection of Colonic Polyps in CT Colonography.  Radiological Society of North America 2005 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 27 - December 2, 2005 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2005/4409985.html