RSNA 2014 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2014


VSER51-14

Streamlining Emergent Hand and Wrist Radiography

Scientific Papers

Presented on December 4, 2014
Presented as part of VSER51: Emergency Radiology Series: Contemporary and (Sometimes) Controversial Topics in Imaging of Trauma  

Participants

Henry Chou MD, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Scott David Steenburg MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Jeffrey William Dunkle MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Sean D. Gussick MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Matthew James Petersen MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Marc D. Kohli MD, Abstract Co-Author: Research Grant, Koninklijke Philips NV Research Grant, Siemens AG
Changyu Shen PhD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Hongbo Lin MS, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

PURPOSE

Physicians often order both a three-view study of the hand and four-view study of the ipsilateral wrist following hand and/or wrist injury. Because hand radiographs include visualization of the carpus, we set out to determine whether a modified study using fewer wrist radiographs performs comparably to the traditional hand and wrist series in the evaluation of acute hand and wrist abnormalities.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board, and the need to obtain informed consent was waived. Two hundred forty patients (50% male; age range 18-92y) with unilateral three-view hand (posteroanterior, oblique, and lateral) and four-view wrist (posteroanterior, oblique, lateral, and ulnar deviation) radiographs obtained concurrently in the emergency setting were included in this study. Four experienced emergency radiologists, blinded to the original report and clinical records, interpreted the original seven images. The patients’ radiographs were then recombined to include only the three hand images and a single ulnar deviated wrist view. These were interpreted by the same radiologists following an eight week delay and in random sequence to reduce memory bias. Two radiologists independently evaluated each patient’s studies. Data analysis was performed using kappa statistics to measure agreement between the seven- and four-view image interpretations.

RESULTS

A total of 479 reports were generated in each of the seven- and four-view image sets, with 142 (29.6%) of the seven-view and 125 (26.1%) of the four-view reports conveying certain or suspected acute osseous findings. Statistical analysis yielded an average inter-method kappa coefficient of 0.818 for the four radiologists, which represents strong agreement between the seven- and four-view interpretations.

CONCLUSION

The modified four-view hand and wrist radiographic series produces diagnostic results comparable to the traditional hand and wrist series in the acute clinical setting.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

A modified four-view hand and wrist radiographic study is effective for assessing acute hand and wrist injury while reducing cost, time, and radiation dose.

Cite This Abstract

Chou, H, Steenburg, S, Dunkle, J, Gussick, S, Petersen, M, Kohli, M, Shen, C, Lin, H, Streamlining Emergent Hand and Wrist Radiography.  Radiological Society of North America 2014 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, - ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2014/14002225.html