Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2014
Series Courses
ER CT VAAMA PRA Category 1 Credits ™: 3.50
ARRT Category A+ Credits: 4.00
Thu, Dec 4 8:30 AM - 12:00 PM Location: S405AB
Participants
Sub-Events
1) Appreciate the rationale for Whole Body Imaging in assessing the polytrauma patient. 2) Compare advantages of whole body versus segmental MDCT protocol. 3) Demonstrate significance of arterial and portal venous phase imaging in the setting blunt abdominal trauma (BAT), and the role of whole body imaging in the setting of BAT. 4) Understand and review strategies for reducing radiation exposure. 5) Discuss strategies and techniques for optimization of whole body imaging protocols in the trauma setting. 6) Discuss Future Directions to allow bridging of anatomy and function.
Of the 4781 trauma patients who presented to our institution, 44(0.9%) had surgically proven TBMI. 22/44 were excluded as they did not have MDCT before surgery. The study cohort consisted of 14 males and 8 females with a median age of 41.5 years and a median Injury Severity Score of 27. 17/22 had blunt trauma and 5/22 had penetrating injury. A correct preoperative imaging diagnosis of TBMI was made in 14/22 of patients. The overall sensitivity of the radiology reports was 63.6% (95% CI: 41-82%), specificity was 79.6 % (95% CI: 67-89%), PPV was 53.9% (95% CI: 33 -73 %) and NPV was 85.5% ( 95% CI: 73-94 %). The accuracy was 90.5%. However, only 59 % (10/17) of patients with blunt injury had a correct preoperative diagnosis. Review of the findings demonstrated that majority of patients with missed blunt TBMI (5/7) demonstrated only indirect signs of injury.
The detection of TBMI in trauma patients on 64MDCT can be improved, especially in patients presenting with blunt injury. Missed cases in this population occurred because the possibility of TBMI was not considered despite the presence of indirect imaging signs.
The prospective diagnosis of TBMI remains challenging despite advances in CT technology and widespread use of 64MDCT.
To evaluate how the implementation of an institutional triaging algorithm impacted the utilization of MDCT imaging of the abdomen and pelvis at a level one trauma center.
The implementation of a clinical algorithm at our level one trauma center resulted in decreased utilization of trauma CT scanning. Our analysis suggests that this clinical algorithm can be used successfully to select patients who require CT imaging in the trauma setting.
In the trauma setting, institutional algorithms can be implemented to prevent unnecessary imaging of patients in a nationwide effort to reduce radiation exposure and hospital costs.
Several recent studies have demonstrated increased sensitivity for identifying contained splenic vascular injury (ie pseudoaneurysm and arteriovenous fistula formation) in trauma patients by the addition of arterial-phase CT abdominal imaging. However, the overall risk-benefit ratio is not known. Using published data, we quantified the number of previously undiagnosed cases of contained splenic vascular injury in trauma patients age 15 and older, as well as the number of patients for whom management would change and the number of new cancer cases induced by the increased radiation dose. During sensitivity analysis, supplemental data from a level 1 trauma center was used to help identify patient subgroups with a more favorable risk-benefit ratio.
1) Demonstrate the spectrum of traumatic aortic injury: typical, atypical and minimal injury. 2) Discuss the role of imaging and tratment of traumatic aortic injury.
1) To discuss the role of MDCT in patients with blunt and penetrating diaphragmatic injuries. 2) Review the MDCT findings of diaphragmatic injuries. 3) Describe potential pitfalls.
Diaphragmatic Injuries remain a challenging diagnosis with potential catastrophic delayed complications. A high degree of suspicion in every case of severe blunt thoracoabdominal trauma or penetrating thoracoabdominal injury is essential. This presentation will provide a practical tutorial for radiologists hoping to improve their interpretive accuracy for both blunt and penetrating DIs. The CT signs of diaphragmatic injuries will be explained. A number of instructive cases will be presented, including frequent diagnostic pitfalls.
Diaphragmatic injuries have a marked impact on the management and prognosis of trauma patients. Motion artifacts may obscure diaphragm injuries during CT of trauma patients with low Glascow Coma Scale (GCS) scores or those who are intubated and ventilated. CT acquisition times are dramatically reduced by using dual source ultra-high pitch (DS-UHP) as compared with conventional single source (SS) protocols. The purpose of this study was to evaluate diaphragmatic motion on simultaneously acquired DS-UHP and SS CT scans in trauma patients.
Ultra high-pitch is advantageous as it allows for better evaluation of diaphragmatic structures by minimizing motion artifacts on images of freely breathing trauma patients.
An ultra high-pitch dual source mode is valuable in trauma patients who are unable to breath-hold as it allows minimization of motion artifacts of the diaphragm as compared with conventional single source reconstructions.
Traumatic diaphragmatic rupture (DR) is an uncommon injury that can be lethal if not detected and treated in a timely manner. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 64MDCT for the detection of DR in patients at our level 1 trauma centre.
Of the 3225 trauma patients presented to our institution, 38(1.2%) had a DR. Fourteen of the 38 were excluded as they did not have MDCT pre-surgery. The cohort consisted of 20 males and 4 females with a median age of 34.5 years and a median Injury Severity Score of 26. Fifteen had a blunt trauma while 9 had a penetrating injury (PI). The overall sensitivity of the radiology reports was 66.7% (95% CI: 44.7- 84.3%), specificity was 100% (95% CI: 94-100%), PPV was 100% (95% CI: 79.2-100%) and NPV was 88.4 (95% CI: 78.4-94.8%) . The accuracy was 91%. However, only 3/9 with PI (33%) had a correct preoperative diagnosis. Most of the missed cases (4/6) had only indirect signs of injury.
The prospective diagnosis of DR remains challenging despite advances in CT technology and widespread use of 64MDCT.
1) Describe the optimal CTA imaging protocol for the evaluation of suspected peripheral vascular injuries. 2) Identify the various imaging manifestations of peripheral vascular injuries. 3) Recognize CTA limitations and pitfalls in the diagnosis of peripheral vascular injuries. 4) Recognize when further evaluation with catheter angiography or surgical exploration are required.
The Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) can lead to organ failure and death in multiply injured patients (MIPs). SIRS results primarily from an immune response to endogenous molecules thought to be liberated from damaged tissue. However, it is not known how the magnitude of tissue injury affects systemic inflammation and organ dysfunction. It is plausible that certain tissues are more prone to release of inflammatory mediators leading to SIRS, and that the magnitude of soft tissue injury may correspond with the degree of systemic inflammation and subsequent organ dysfunction. The purpose of this study was to determine how the total volume of soft tissue damage, as quantified on admission whole body CT scan, correlated with the magnitude of inflammation and organ dysfunction in MIPs.
The magnitude of systemic inflammation and organ dysfunction is a function of STDVS. These results demonstrate a dichotomous response of how MIPs tolerate soft tissue damage, suggesting that some patients are at higher risk of systemic inflammation than others.
STDVS as calculated on admission CT may serve as a potential clinical tool for predicting systemic inflammation and organ dysfunction during the recovery process. Further investigations are required to elucidate the underlying pathophysiologic pathways for how soft tissue damage causes inflammation and organ dysfunction in MIPs.
Physicians often order both a three-view study of the hand and four-view study of the ipsilateral wrist following hand and/or wrist injury. Because hand radiographs include visualization of the carpus, we set out to determine whether a modified study using fewer wrist radiographs performs comparably to the traditional hand and wrist series in the evaluation of acute hand and wrist abnormalities.
A total of 479 reports were generated in each of the seven- and four-view image sets, with 142 (29.6%) of the seven-view and 125 (26.1%) of the four-view reports conveying certain or suspected acute osseous findings. Statistical analysis yielded an average inter-method kappa coefficient of 0.818 for the four radiologists, which represents strong agreement between the seven- and four-view interpretations.
The modified four-view hand and wrist radiographic series produces diagnostic results comparable to the traditional hand and wrist series in the acute clinical setting.
A modified four-view hand and wrist radiographic study is effective for assessing acute hand and wrist injury while reducing cost, time, and radiation dose.
Cite This Abstract