RSNA 2014 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2014


VSER51-02

Are We Missing Traumatic Bowel and Mesenteric Injuries?  

Scientific Papers

Presented on December 4, 2014
Presented as part of VSER51: Emergency Radiology Series: Contemporary and (Sometimes) Controversial Topics in Imaging of Trauma  

Participants

Bret Allan Landry MD, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Samir Faidi MD, FRCPC, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Angela Coates MEd, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Michael Nathan Patlas MD, FRCPC, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

PURPOSE

Traumatic bowel and mesenteric injury (TBMI) is an uncommon entity that can be lethal if not detected and treated in a timely manner. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 64MDCT for the detection of TBMI in patients at our level 1 trauma centre.  

METHOD AND MATERIALS

We used our hospital's trauma registry to identify patients with a diagnosis of TBMI from January 1, 2006 to June 30, 2013. Only patients who had a 64MDCT scan at presentation and subsequently underwent laparotomy/laparoscopy were included in the study cohort. Using the surgical findings as the gold standard, the accuracy of prospective radiology reports was analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 4781 trauma patients who presented to our institution, 44(0.9%) had surgically proven TBMI. 22/44 were excluded as they did not have MDCT before surgery. The study cohort consisted of 14 males and 8 females with a median age of 41.5 years and a median Injury Severity Score of 27. 17/22 had blunt trauma and 5/22 had penetrating injury. A correct preoperative imaging diagnosis of TBMI was made in 14/22 of patients. The overall sensitivity of the radiology reports was 63.6% (95% CI: 41-82%), specificity was 79.6 % (95% CI: 67-89%), PPV was 53.9% (95% CI: 33 -73 %) and NPV was 85.5% ( 95% CI: 73-94 %). The accuracy was 90.5%. However, only 59 % (10/17) of patients with blunt injury had a correct preoperative diagnosis. Review of the findings demonstrated that majority of patients with missed blunt TBMI (5/7) demonstrated only indirect signs of injury.

CONCLUSION

The detection of TBMI in trauma patients on 64MDCT can be improved, especially in patients presenting with blunt injury. Missed cases in this population occurred because the possibility of TBMI was not considered despite the presence of indirect imaging signs.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

The prospective diagnosis of TBMI remains challenging despite advances in CT technology and widespread use of 64MDCT.

Cite This Abstract

Landry, B, Faidi, S, Coates, A, Patlas, M, Are We Missing Traumatic Bowel and Mesenteric Injuries?  .  Radiological Society of North America 2014 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, - ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2014/14000272.html