RSNA 2012 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2012


LL-PHS-TU7C

MRI Liver Volumetry Using 3D Geodesic Active Contour Segmentation Coupled with a Level-set Algorithm

Scientific Informal (Poster) Presentations

Presented on November 27, 2012
Presented as part of LL-PHS-TUPM: Physics Afternoon CME Posters

Participants

Hieu Trung Huynh PhD, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Kenji Suzuki PhD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Ibrahim Karademir MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Rony Kampalath MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Aytekin Oto MD, Abstract Co-Author: Honorarium, Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV Research Grant, Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV Research Grant, Bayer AG Research Grant, Visualase Inc Research Grant, General Electric Company

PURPOSE

Liver segmentation is challenging due to the intensity similarity between liver and other organs. Our purpose was to develop an accurate automated 3D liver segmentation scheme for measuring liver volumes in MRI.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

Our scheme for MRI liver volumetry consisted of five steps. First, an anisotropic diffusion smoothing filter was applied to T1-weighted MR images of the liver in the portal-venous-phase to reduce noise while preserving the liver structure. An edge enhancer and a nonlinear gray-scale converter were applied to enhance the liver boundary. This boundary-enhanced image was used as a speed function for a 3D fast-marching algorithm to generate an initial surface that roughly approximated the liver shape. A 3D geodesic-active-contour segmentation algorithm refined the initial surface so as to more precisely fit the liver boundary. The liver volume was calculated based on the refined liver surface. Our database consisted of 11 cases of hepatic MRI scans with slice thickness and spacing of 5 and 2.5 mm, respectively. The automated MRI liver volumetry was compared with those manually traced by a radiologist, used as “gold standard.”

RESULTS

The mean liver volume obtained by our automated scheme was 1707 ± 369 cc, whereas the mean manual volume was 1731 ± 360 cc. The two volumetrics reached an excellent agreement (intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.98) without statistical significance (p=0.18). The average accuracy and Dice overlap coefficient were 99.4 ± 0.15% and 0.94 ± 0.02, respectively. The mean processing time for our automated scheme was 1.03 ± 0.09 min (CPU: Intel, Xeon, 2.66 GHz), whereas that for manual volumetry was 27.7 ± 3.5 min (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The MR liver volumetrics based on our automated scheme agreed excellently with “gold-standard” manual volumetrics, and required substantially less completion time.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

Our automated scheme provides an efficient and accurate method of measuring liver volumes on MR images; thus, it would be useful for radiologists in their liver volume measurement.

Cite This Abstract

Huynh, H, Suzuki, K, Karademir, I, Kampalath, R, Oto, A, MRI Liver Volumetry Using 3D Geodesic Active Contour Segmentation Coupled with a Level-set Algorithm.  Radiological Society of North America 2012 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 25 - November 30, 2012 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2012/12043896.html