RSNA 2013 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2013


SSC02-08

Cardiac Computed Tomography (CCT) for Predicting Left Atrial Appendage Occluder Device Size

Scientific Formal (Paper) Presentations

Presented on December 2, 2013
Presented as part of SSC02: Cardiac (Anatomy and Function I)

Participants

Orly Goitein MD, Presenter: Research Grant, Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV
Grupper Avisahy, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Elio Di Segni MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Eli Konen MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Ashraf Hamdan MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Victor Guetta, Abstract Co-Author: Proctor, Edwards Lifesciences Corporation
Ilan Hai, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
David Luria MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Michael Glikson MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

PURPOSE

Atrial fibrillation (AF) may cause thromboembolic stroke. The left atrial appendage (LAA) is the thrombi source in more than 90% of strokes. Several devices have been developed to occlude the LAA. Inaccurate LAA orifice sizing may lead to utilization of more than one device per procedure, or inadequate LAA occlusion.   The purpose of this study was to assess the contribution of cardiac Computed Tomography (CCT) measurements for LAA device sizing with.  

METHOD AND MATERIALS

All subjects underwent ECG gated CT scans prior to LAA closure device insertion. CCT scans were performed using a 256-slice scanner with retrospective electrocardiographic gating . Assessed parameters included: LAA maximal and minimal diameters (mm), LAA depth (mm). These values were compared with final implanted device size. Echocardiographic follow up at six weeks was performed in order to document the presence of regurgitation, as evidence for incomplete LAA occlusion.  

RESULTS

This study cohort included 22 chronic AF patients (9 males, average age 76 years). Two procedures failed, the maximal LAA diameter was 39 mm in both. The total number of devices used was 24 in 20 patients (1.2 devices per patient). Mean maximal CCT and minimal diameters were 27±5 and 22±5 mm respectively. Mean LAA depth was 22±4 mm. Mean device size was 24±4. Good correlation was found between maximal CCT diameter and device size (Pearson correlation=0.45; p=0.04). No correlation was found between minimal LAA diameter, LAA depth and device size (Pearson correlation=-0.0.08; p=0.7 and -0.02;p=0.9, respectively). LAA diameter >30 mm (N=5) was associated with adverse device sizing ; procedure failure (2/5) and incomplete LAA occlusion (2/5) with regurgitation on echocardiographic follow up.

CONCLUSION

CCT should be considered as an important adjunct modality for device sizing. LAA maximal diameter > 30 mm was predictive of unfavorable procedure outcome including procedure failure and incomplete LAA occlusion in 80% of cases with large LAA ostia.  

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

Cardiac CT is an important imaging modality before LAA occluder insertion. It allows accurate LAA size evaluation and can identify potential problematic cases prior to device implantation.

Cite This Abstract

Goitein, O, Avisahy, G, Di Segni, E, Konen, E, Hamdan, A, Guetta, V, Hai, I, Luria, D, Glikson, M, Cardiac Computed Tomography (CCT) for Predicting Left Atrial Appendage Occluder Device Size.  Radiological Society of North America 2013 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, December 1 - December 6, 2013 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2013/13028838.html