RSNA 2009 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2009


SSC10-03

Axial Loaded Knee MR Imaging for the Evaluation of Medial Meniscus Extrusion

Scientific Papers

Presented on November 30, 2009
Presented as part of SSC10: Musculoskeletal (Knee Disorders)

Participants

Ilan Elias MD, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Adam C. Zoga MD, Abstract Co-Author: Speakers Bureau, Bayer AG
Christopher Geordie Roth MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Marcus P. Besser PhD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
William B. Morrison MD, Abstract Co-Author: Medical Advisory Board, ONI Medical Systems, Inc

PURPOSE

Meniscal extrusion greater than 3mm has been shown to be associated with underlying tear. We sought to evaluate the effect of axial load on the lower extremity for the MRI evaluation of medial meniscus extrusion in the knee.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

50 patients (32F/18M, avg age 48, range 15-74) with clinical suspicion of medial meniscal tear had MR exams using a routine noncontrast knee protocol followed by repeat acquisition of sagittal PD FSE and coronal T2 FSE sequences after axial loading with an MRI compatible simulated weight-bearing device to 50% body weight. Pre and post loading sequences were evaluated by 2 MSK radiologists. Medial meniscus tears were recorded, medial meniscus extrusion (MME) was recorded and measured without and with simulated weight-bearing. Comparison between meniscus tear and non-tear groups were made.

RESULTS

20 of 50 (40%) had medial meniscus tear. There was a significant difference in MME in the overall population with and without axial load; mean MME without load was 2.06mm, 2.56mm with load (p<0.0001). There was a significant difference in MME in patients without tear (mean 0.4mm) versus those with tear (mean 3.2mm) on MRI without load (p<0.001). An increase in extrusion was noted for both groups on axial loaded MRI. For the medial meniscal tear group, mean MME increased from 3.2mm to 3.9mm with load (22% increase, p<0.001). For the group with no tear, mean MME without load was 0.4mm, 0.6mm with load (50% increase, p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

There is a significantly higher degree of medial meniscal extrusion with tear. However, medial meniscal extrusion increases with axial load independent of presence of underlying tear.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

1) Meniscal extrusion is a potentially useful secondary sign of underlying tear. 2) Increase in medial meniscal displacement with axial load may help reveal clinically significant extrusion.  

Cite This Abstract

Elias, I, Zoga, A, Roth, C, Besser, M, Morrison, W, Axial Loaded Knee MR Imaging for the Evaluation of Medial Meniscus Extrusion.  Radiological Society of North America 2009 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 29 - December 4, 2009 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2009/8016590.html