RSNA 2009 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2009


RO35-06

The Comparison of Radiological Response versus Biochemical Response in Ovarian Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy during Phase II Trials

Scientific Papers

Presented on December 1, 2009
Presented as part of RO35: BOOST: Gynecology—Integrated Science and Practice (ISP) Session

 Research and Education Foundation Support

Participants

Xiaozhou Ma MD, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Mengye Guo, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Jeffrey T. Yap PhD, Abstract Co-Author: Researcher, Novartis AG Researcher, GlaxoSmithKline plc Researcher, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company Researcher, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc Researcher, Pfizer Inc
Jyothipriya Jagannathan MBBS, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Mizuki Nishino MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Nikhil H. Ramaiya MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
William B. Hanlon, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Gordon J. Harris PhD, Abstract Co-Author: Medical Advisory Board, Fovia, Inc
Annick D. Van Den Abbeele MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
00030490-DMT et al, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

PURPOSE

To compare the prognostic value of the tumor marker Cancer Antigen 125 (CA 125) with the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) in patients with ovarian cancer receiving chemotherapy.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

CT scans of patients entered in two IRB-approved and closed phase II randomized trials using systemic chemotherapy in ovarian cancer were retrospectively reviewed. The patients with baseline and at least one more radiological assessments were included for evaluation. The radiological results and the corresponding CA 125 values obtained within a two-week period were compared after 2 cycles of chemotherapy. The CA 125 analysis was based on criteria of 20% increase and 30% decrease relative to the baseline defining progressive disease and partial response respectively, and otherwise stable disease. The radiological analysis was based on RECIST criteria. Statistical analysis was performed using McNemar’s test.

RESULTS

Of 28 patients enrolled in two closed trials, 18 patients had 2 to 13 follow-up CT scans that met our inclusion criteria. After two cycles of chemotherapy, CA 125/RECIST criteria diagnosed partial response (PR) in 7(38.9%)/6(33.3%), stable disease (SD) in 3(16.7%)/8(44.4%), and progressive disease (PD) in 8(44.4%)/4(22.2%) patients respectively. The response criteria for CA 125 and RECIST were concordant in 14 (78%) patients (95% CI [52.4%, 93.6%]), and discordant in 4(22.0%) patients (95% CI [6.4%, 47.6%] (p>0.05). Of the 4 patients with discordant CA125/RECIST, 2 were classified as progressors (PD) by CA 125 after 2 cycles of chemotherapy which only become evident by RECIST after 4 chemotherapy cycles, and the other 2 patients were classified as responders (PR+SD) by RECIST after 2 cycles of chemotherapy while a decrease in CA 125 was only seen after 6 cycles of chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Evaluation of therapeutic response based on CA 125 and RECIST criteria show concordant results in 78% of patients after two cycles of chemotherapy. With regards to prognostic value, radiological response by RECIST may have a superior performance than biochemical response in early detection of response to chemotherapy, while in non-responders, CA 125 may be more sensitive in detecting early progression.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

Biochemical (CA 125) and radiological (RECIST) responses are two important prognostic indicators for predicting response to therapy in patients with ovarian cancer undergoing chemotherapy.

Cite This Abstract

Ma, X, Guo, M, Yap, J, Jagannathan, J, Nishino, M, Ramaiya, N, Hanlon, W, Harris, G, Van Den Abbeele, A, et al, 0, The Comparison of Radiological Response versus Biochemical Response in Ovarian Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy during Phase II Trials.  Radiological Society of North America 2009 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 29 - December 4, 2009 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2009/8011316.html