RSNA 2007 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2007


SST15-01

Sixty-four Slice Multidetector CT Arthrography and Virtual Arthroscopy in Shoulder Joint Evaluation: An Alternative and Effective Technique

Scientific Papers

Presented on November 30, 2007
Presented as part of SST15: Musculoskeletal (Shoulder Disorders)

Participants

Gloria Pasqua Fanelli MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Massimiliano D'Erme, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Martina Martinelli MD, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Antonella Francioso, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Francesco Giovagnorio MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Alessandra Tomei, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Nelia Ravazzolo, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Laura La Barbera MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Dorina Flecca, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
et al, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
et al, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

PURPOSE

To asses the accuracy of gaseous MDCT arthrography and virtual arthroscopy (VA) in the evaluation of glenohumeral joint in patients with shoulder instability, using as references arthroscopy results

METHOD AND MATERIALS

97patients (68men and 29women, mean-age 44years, range 19-69) with shoulder dislocation-translation and/or clinical signs of instability underwent MDCT-arthrography and VA reconstruction. All scans were performed using 64-detector row helical CT scanners, with following parameters: 200Kv; 40mA; Tck 0.6mm; Coll. 0.6; ReconIncr 0.6mm; FOV 18x18cm; matrice 512x512; preparation and acquisition time 10min. The patients were examined in supine position with the shoulder in neutral position; intra-articular injection was performed, posteriorly, administering 25cc of room air. The isotropic volumetric data were downloaded to a workstation, providing excellent MPR images, volumetric rendering images (VR) and VA, performed using a PC-based 3D reconstruction program. All patients underwent conventional arthroscopy and results of both tecniques were compared, weighing up sensitivity and specificity

RESULTS

Arthro-CT and VA detected: 19 non-pathologic shoulder; 12 antero-superior glenoid labrum lesions; 43 antero-inferior glenoid labrum lesions; 3 posterior glenoid labrum lesions. Sensitivity and specificity were 94% and 100%, respectively. Arthro-MDCT and VA furthermore identified: 29 wide capsule; 13 Bankart lesions; 22 Bankart osseous lesions; 19 Hill-Sachs lesions; 20 cuff-rotator tears; all these lesions were diagnosed with sensitivity and specificity of 100%

CONCLUSION

The advantages of gaseous artro-TCMD are: fastness and easiness to do, reproducibility, tolerability (air hasn’t side effects), high spatial resolution, multi-parameter (MPR, VR, VA) and highly accuracy. VA enhances the diagnostic performance of arthro-CT, completing the CT evaluation of main shoulder pathologies. VA provides an ulterior point of view of shoulder joint and images so realistic and didactic, which are useful especially to clinicians not experienced in the assessment of cross-sectional and to orthopaedic surgeon into surgery planning (arthroscopy or arthrotomy)

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

VA enhances the diagnostic performance of arthro-CT

Cite This Abstract

Fanelli, G, D'Erme, M, Martinelli, M, Francioso, A, Giovagnorio, F, Tomei, A, Ravazzolo, N, La Barbera, L, Flecca, D, et al, , et al, , Sixty-four Slice Multidetector CT Arthrography and Virtual Arthroscopy in Shoulder Joint Evaluation: An Alternative and Effective Technique.  Radiological Society of North America 2007 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 25 - November 30, 2007 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2007/5012830.html