RSNA 2007 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2007


SSG01-08

Technical Recall in Film Screen and Digital Screening Mammography

Scientific Papers

Presented on November 27, 2007
Presented as part of SSG01: Breast Imaging (Digital Mammography)

Participants

Lumarie Santiago, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Tamara Miner Haygood MD, PhD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Gary Jacob Whitman MD, Abstract Co-Author: Stockholder, General Electric Company
Edward Neely Atkinson PhD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
William Robert Geiser MS, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

PURPOSE

To evaluate the technical recall rate of film screen and digital screening mammography and influence of the presence or absence of prior studies.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

Retrospective review of 198 film screen (FSM) and 211 digital (DM) recalled bilateral screening mammograms of patients without breast implants following institutional review board approval. The mammograms were interpreted in batches after patients had left the imaging area. Each exam was interpreted by one of twelve radiologists. Final outcomes were determined by biopsy or follow up studies including mammography and/or ultrasound at 6 months or greater if available.

RESULTS

Twenty four (12.1%) recalled FSM’s were interpreted without prior films and 174 (87.9%) were interpreted with priors. The three most common recall reasons for FSM interpreted with and without priors were mass/masses, technical and calcifications. Technical recalls comprised 28.8% (57/198). One hundred and forty nine (70.3%) recalled DM’s were interpreted without prior films and 63 (29.7%) were interpreted with priors. The three most common recall reasons for DM interpreted with and without priors were mass/masses, calcifications and focal asymmetry. Technical recalls comprised 6.2 % (13/211). There was no significant difference in the technical recall rated within each modality regardless of the presence of prior films. There was a significantly lower technical recall rate for DM regardless of the presence of prior films when compared with FSM (P<0.001 with priors, P=0.04 without priors).

CONCLUSION

In our practice, DM had a significantly lower technical recall rate regardless of the presence of prior films.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

Digital mammogrphy's lower technical recall rate may improve performance in screening mammography centers.

Cite This Abstract

Santiago, L, Haygood, T, Whitman, G, Atkinson, E, Geiser, W, Technical Recall in Film Screen and Digital Screening Mammography.  Radiological Society of North America 2007 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 25 - November 30, 2007 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2007/5002588.html