RSNA 2014 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2014


MKS370

Correlation between BMD Measurements on Unenhanced Routine CT Scans Using a Phantom-less Measurement Tool and the 10-year Fracture Probability Calculated by FRAX®

Scientific Posters

Presented on December 2, 2014
Presented as part of MKS-TUA: Musculoskeletal Tuesday Poster Discussions

Participants

Andrea Toelly, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Constanze Bardach, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Michael Weber, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Rui Gong, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Yanbo Lai, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Pei Wang, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Yulin Guo MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Michael Gruber MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

PURPOSE

To evaluate the correlation between bone mineral density (BMD) measurements on unenhanced, routine CT scans using a phantom-less measurement tool and the 10-year fracture probability calculated by the FRAX® tool. In addition, the ability to identify a potentially aggravated fracture risk using this measurement tool was investigated.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

Seventy-seven postmenopausal women (mean age: 57.2 years), who underwent a routine, unenhanced CT scan, were included. The mean BMD value of each patient, including the Th12 – L4 vertebrae, was calculated retrospectively using a commercially available phantom-less measurement tool. Exclusion criteria were vertebral fractures, and sclerotic or osteolytic bone lesions. A minimum of two measurable vertebrae was required. In addition, the patient’s 10-year probability of a major osteoporotic fracture and of a hip fracture were calculated using the FRAX® tool without including DXA-BMD values.

RESULTS

Mean BMD values of patients with a 10-year probability of a major osteoporotic fracture ≥5% differed significantly compared to patients with a FRAX® score <5% (mean BMD value ≥5%: 59.13 mg/cm³; <5%: 83.32 mg/cm³; t=3,460, p=0.001). Phantom-less BMD measurements correlated significantly (p<0.001) with the fracture risk evaluated by FRAX® (Pearson correlation coefficient: major osteoporotic fracture risk R=-0.526, hip fracture risk R=-0.464). With a threshold of about 70 mg/cm³, the sensitivity was 75%, with a false-positive rate of 36.8%. However, with a threshold of about 80 mg/cm³ the sensitivity was 80% and the false-positive rate raised up to 50.9%. The intra-rater agreement of BMD measurements was calculated with an intraclass correlation (ICC) of 0.986, and the inter-observer reliability was calculated with an ICC of 0.987.

CONCLUSION

An increased fracture risk can be diagnosed as an additive finding on routine CT scans, without additional radiation exposure, by using a phantom-less tool. Patients with a decreased BMD value should be further evaluated using the FRAX® 10-year fracture probability calculation.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

Patients with a decreased BMD value, measured with a phantom-less tool on routine CT scans, may benefit from an additional calculation of the FRAX® score to predict osteoporotic bone conditions.

Cite This Abstract

Toelly, A, Bardach, C, Weber, M, Gong, R, Lai, Y, Wang, P, Guo, Y, Gruber, M, Correlation between BMD Measurements on Unenhanced Routine CT Scans Using a Phantom-less Measurement Tool and the 10-year Fracture Probability Calculated by FRAX®.  Radiological Society of North America 2014 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, - ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2014/14045539.html