RSNA 2014 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2014


SSK24-02

Radiofrequency Ablation versus Non-anatomical Resection: Propensity Score Analyses of Long-term Outcome in 580 patients  

Scientific Papers

Presented on December 3, 2014
Presented as part of SSK24: Vascular/Interventional (IR: Liver Ablation)

Participants

Tae Wook Kang, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Hyunchul Rhim MD, PhD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Seong-Yoon Ryu MD, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Min Woo Lee, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Hyo Keun Lim MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Young-Sun Kim, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

PURPOSE

To compare the long-term therapeutic outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with non-anatomical resection (NAR) in patients with a small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ≤ 3cm as a first-line treatment.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

The data of 580 patients with a small HCC (≤ 3cm) underwent ultrasonography-guided percutaneous RFA (n=438) or NAR (n=142) as a first-line treatment, were reviewed. For comparison of therapeutic efficacy between RFA and NAR groups, local tumor progression (LTP), intrahepatic distant recurrence (IDR), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were analyzed using a 1-to-1 propensity score match. In addition, major complications and post-operative hospital stay were compared.

RESULTS

Before propensity score matching (n=580), 5-year cumulative LTP (20.9% vs. 12.7%, p = 0.093) and OS rates (85.5% vs. 90.9%, p = 0.194) were comparable between two groups while 5-year cumulative IDR (62.7% vs. 36.6%, p < 0.001) and DFS rates (31.7% vs. 61.1%, p < 0.001) in NAR group were significantly better than that in RFA group. After the matching (n=198), there were no significant differences in terms of all therapeutic outcomes including 5-year cumulative IDR (47.0% vs. 40.2%, p = 0.240) and DFS rates (48.9% vs. 54.4%, p = 0.201) in both groups. RFA was superior to NAR in terms of major complication rate (5.6% vs. 2.1%, p = 0.016) and post-operative hospital stay (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In patient with a small HCC (≤3cm) as a first-line treatment, there was no significant difference in LTP, IDR, DFS and OS between RFA and NAR. However, RFA yielded less invasiveness than NAR.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

There was no significant difference between RFA and NAR in terms of long-term therapeutic outcomes including Local Tumor Progression, Intrahepatic Distant Recurrence, Disease Free Survival, and Overall Survival in patients with a small HCC ≤3cm (BCLC very early/early-stage HCC) as a first-line treatment.

Cite This Abstract

Kang, T, Rhim, H, Ryu, S, Lee, M, Lim, H, Kim, Y, Radiofrequency Ablation versus Non-anatomical Resection: Propensity Score Analyses of Long-term Outcome in 580 patients  .  Radiological Society of North America 2014 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, - ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2014/14015934.html