RSNA 2014 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2014


SSE18-06

CTA Recanalization Score – A Reliable Measure of Recanalization

Scientific Papers

Presented on December 1, 2014
Presented as part of SSE18: Neuroradiology (Stroke & Cerebrovascular Reserve)

Participants

Evgenia Klourfeld, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Petra Cimflova, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Miroslav Skorna MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Josep Puig Alcantara MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Daruish Dowlatshahi MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Ana Calleja Sanz, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Sung-Il Sohn, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Alexander Yves Poppe, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Seong Hwan Ahn, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Negar Asdaghi, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Albert Jin, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Teri Stewart, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Bijoy Menon MBBS, MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Andrew Demchuk MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

PURPOSE

Recanalization is associated with a 4 fold increase in good outcomes in acute ischemic stroke. CTA has become the clinical and research standard of cerebrovascular assessment. Currently, there is no validated standardized CTA recanalization scoring system. We aimed to develop a CTA-based recanalization scale, and test the reliability of its components.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

Data is from INTERRSeCT, a multi-center prospective study, examining clot characteristics associated with early recanalization. Three raters assessed CTAs of 30 randomly selected patients at baseline and 2-6h later. Baseline scans were scored for site of primary intracranial arterial occlusive lesion (PIAOL), residual flow through PIAOL and distal thrombus burden (DTB). Recanalization was assessed on follow-up CTA using PIAOL debulking, change in residual flow, and DTB. A CTA Recanalization Score (CTARS) consisting of 8 categories was used to summarize recanalization of PIAOL and its distal vasculature. Reliability was quantified using kappa (weighted when appropriate)

RESULTS

Agreement on PIAOL location varied from excellent proximally (ICA, M1, proximal M2) to poor for more distal sites. Agreement was moderate to substantial on residual flow (Kw=0.67, 0.49, 0.55), and fair to moderate on DTB (Kw=0.41, 0.17, 0.31) at baseline. Reliability was excellent for PIAOL debulking (Kw=0.87, 0.90, 0.92), residual flow change (Kw=0.91, 0.88, 0.86), and moderate to substantial for follow-up DTB (Kw=0.78, 0.43, 0.51). Near perfect agreement was obtained on final CTARS (Kw=0.90, 0.96, 0.88).

CONCLUSION

CTARS is a reliable method of assessing recanalization of PIAOL and its' distal vasculature. Future studies should focus on prospective scale validation and performance with other imaging modalities.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

A reliable CTA recanalization assessment method will help in comparing novel thrombolytic agents vs. current standard of care in acute stroke management.

Cite This Abstract

Klourfeld, E, Cimflova, P, Skorna, M, Puig Alcantara, J, Dowlatshahi, D, Calleja Sanz, A, Sohn, S, Poppe, A, Ahn, S, Asdaghi, N, Jin, A, Stewart, T, Menon, B, Demchuk, A, CTA Recanalization Score – A Reliable Measure of Recanalization.  Radiological Society of North America 2014 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, - ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2014/14014337.html