RSNA 2014 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2014


MKS396

Assessment of Sacroiliac Gouty Arthritis with Dual-energy CT: An Initial Study

Scientific Posters

Presented on December 4, 2014
Presented as part of MKS-THB: Musculoskeletal Thursday Poster Discussions

Participants

Min Liu, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Fan Yang, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Chang Liu, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

PURPOSE

Gout is the most common crystal deposition arthropathy currently diagnosed clinically due to frequently involving the first metatarsophalangeal joint. To our best knowledge, monosodium urate (MSU) crystal deposition in the sacroiliac joint has rarely been reported to date. The purpose of this study is to examine the features of MSU crystal deposition and erosion in sacroiliac gouty arthritis with dual-energy CT (DECT). 

METHOD AND MATERIALS

This study was approved by an institutional review board; patient informed consent was obtained. Twelve patients (10 men, 2 women; mean age, 47 years±12 [standard deviation]) with sacroiliac gouty arthritis and 10 normal controls (6 men, 4 women; mean age, 49 years±13 [standard deviation]) were enrolled in this study. DECT with gout protocol was performed in all patients for detection of MSU crystal deposition and bone erosion. A dedicate post-processing gout software was used to observe the color-coding MSU crystal. Two readers scored blindly the DECT scans for MSU crystal deposition and erosion, and kappa test was used to determine the observer agreement. 

RESULTS

Of 12 patients, the serum urate levels were partly elevated (7 cases) and partly normal (5cases). MSU crystal deposition was observed in sacroilicac joints (7 cases), lumbar facet joints (5 cases) and discs sacroilicac joints (4 cases). Bone erosion was found in 6 cases. Compared with sacroiliac gouty arthritis patients, no MSU crystal deposition was detected in all normal controls (p<0.001). Good agreement was obtained between two reader for observing the MSU crystal deposition (κ= 0.93) and bone erosion (κ= 0.91).

CONCLUSION

DECT can serve as a promising imaging technique for visualization of MSU crystal deposition and erosion in sacroiliac gouty arthritis.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

Diverse factors can lead to sacroilitis besides gout. Sometimes imaging differential diagnosis is difficult. DECT provides a relative new non-invasive imaging modality that is able to distinguish urate crystals. These findings will benefit the diagnosis of gouty arthritis.

Cite This Abstract

Liu, M, Yang, F, Liu, C, Assessment of Sacroiliac Gouty Arthritis with Dual-energy CT: An Initial Study.  Radiological Society of North America 2014 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, - ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2014/14014159.html