RSNA 2014 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2014


SSC10-03

Utility of Amide Proton Transfer Imaging for Prediction of Recurrent Glioblastoma: Initial Experience

Scientific Papers

Presented on December 1, 2014
Presented as part of SSC10: Neuroradiology (New Techniques in Brain Tumor Imaging)

Participants

Kye Jin Park MD, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Ho Sung Kim, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Choong Gon Choi MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Sang Joon Kim MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

PURPOSE

To test the predictive value of the amide proton transfer (APT) imaging for differentiating recurrent tumor from treatment-related effect in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

Twenty-seven consecutive patients who showed new or enlarged, contrast-enhancing lesions within the radiation field after concurrent chemoradiotherapy were assessed by use of conventional MR imaging and APT imaging. APT imaging was performed using a gradient-echo multishot echo-planar imaging with thirty frequency offsets from + 5.0 to -5.0 ppm in 0.357 ppm step. The imaging parameters for APT were as follows: echo time = 6.2 msec; a flip angle = 25 degree; RF irradiation power = 1.0µT; and saturation duration = 70 msec/shot. The calculated APT asymmetry map at the offset of 3.5 ppm is called the APT image. The APT signal was measured on solid (APTsolid) and necrotic (APTnecrosis) of the enlarged contrast-enhancing lesion using 'hot-spot' method. Reference standard was pathology or clinico-radiologic diagnosis. The diagnostic performance of APT parameter was determined by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and leave-one-out cross validation. Interreader agreement was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients were subsequently classified as having recurrent tumor (n=19) or treatment-related effect (n=8). There was statistically significant differences of APTsolid between the two groups (median, 0.055 vs 0.024; P = .007). But APTnecrosis was not significantly different between the two groups (median, 0.004 vs 0.009; P =.339). ROC curve and leave-one-out cross validation showed the APTsolid to be the predictor of recurrent tumor, with a sensitivity of 94.7% and a specificity of 71.4%. The ICCs for APTsolid and APTnecrosis were 0.81 and 0.89.

CONCLUSION

APT signal on solid portion of enlarged contrast-enhancing lesion can be used for differentiating recurrent tumor from treatment-related effect in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

APT imaging can be a potential, noninvasive imaging biomarker for monitoring treatment response in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas.

Cite This Abstract

Park, K, Kim, H, Choi, C, Kim, S, Utility of Amide Proton Transfer Imaging for Prediction of Recurrent Glioblastoma: Initial Experience.  Radiological Society of North America 2014 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, - ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2014/14011953.html