RSNA 2014 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2014


VSIO51-03

Quantitative Validation of Thermal Ablation: An Improved Image Fusion Algorithm to Reflect Treatment Coverage

Scientific Papers

Presented on December 4, 2014
Presented as part of VSIO51: Interventional Oncology Series: Lung and Bone

Participants

David Thomas Glidden BS, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Grayson L. Baird MS, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Derek Merck, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Damian E. Dupuy MD, Abstract Co-Author: Research Grant, NeuWave Medical Inc Board of Directors, BSD Medical Corporation Stockholder, BSD Medical Corporation Speaker, Educational Symposia

PURPOSE

To propose the foundation of a quantitative method for validation of thermal ablations.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

24 patients (M:F= 10:14) with solitary lung tumors underwent microwave ablation under CT-guidance. Each tumor was treated with one of four MW applicators (BSD Medical, Salt Lake City, UT, Neuwave Medical, Madison, WI) for 5-15 minutes according to the manufacturers’ specifications. Each case included a CT scan pre- intra- and post-procedure. Tumor volumes were manually segmented from pre-scans and ablation volumes from post-scans using the ground glass halo surrounding the tumor. Pre-scans were fused onto post-scans using two algorithms—a rigid registration, and a rigid plus deformable registration. Volume overlap resulting from both algorithms were calculated. Bland-Altman plots and Deming regression were used to identify possible differences in these image fusion techniques.

RESULTS

The volume overlap between tumors and ablation zones increased proportional to tumor size when deformable registration was applied (p < 0.001). Deming regression showed a significant deviation from perfect concordance between rigid and deformable registration (95 % CI: [1.13, 1.39]) in which more volume overlap was attributable to deformable registration.

CONCLUSION

Quantitative validation of thermal ablation margin analysis remains challenging due to inherent tumor position and morphology changes after ablation. Rigid registration techniques rarely reflect how an ablation zone covers the tumor and margin because of movement (e.g. respiratory, tumor displacement, patient position). The addition of deformable registration may more accurately reflect how the tumor and ablation zone overlap, thus improving local control outcomes.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

Improved fusion between pre- and post-scans using deformable registration will provide a basis for quantitative validation of thermal ablations by correcting for anatomical movement.

Cite This Abstract

Glidden, D, Baird, G, Merck, D, Dupuy, D, Quantitative Validation of Thermal Ablation: An Improved Image Fusion Algorithm to Reflect Treatment Coverage.  Radiological Society of North America 2014 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, - ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2014/14011262.html