RSNA 2014 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2014


SSG04-09

A Quantitative Comparison of Noise Reduction across Five Commercial (Hybrid and Model Based) Iterative Reconstruction Techniques: An Anthropomorphic Phantom Study

Scientific Papers

Presented on December 2, 2014
Presented as part of SSG04: Gastrointestinal (CT Dose Reduction I)

Participants

Manuel Patino MD, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Jorge Mario Fuentes MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Koichi Hayano MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Avinash Ranesh Kambadakone MD, FRCR, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Jennifer W. Uyeda MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Dushyant V. Sahani MD, Abstract Co-Author: Research Grant, General Electric Company

PURPOSE

To compare the performance of three Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction Techniques (h-IRTs) (ASIR, iDose4, SAFIRE) with their respective strengths on image noise reduction on low-dose Computed Tomography (CT) exams using Filtered Back Projection (FBP) as standard reference. Also, to compare image noise reduction between h-IRTs and Model Based IRTs (MB-IRTs) (MBIR/Veo and IMR) on low dose exams.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

An anthropomorphic abdomen phantom was scanned at 100 - 120 kVp and different mAs (25-100) on three CT systems (GE Discovery CT750-HD, ASIR, MBIR/Veo; Philips iCT, iDose4, IMR; and Siemens Somatom, SAFIRE). Images were reconstructed using FBP and various strengths of IRTs. Nine noise measurements (ROI mean size 423 mm2) on extra-colonic fat for the strengths of IRTs were recorded and compared to FBP using ANOVA. Radiation dose in CTDIvol and DLP was also compared.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference on radiation dose and image noise on FBP between the scanners (p>0.05). Gradual image noise reduction was observed with each increment of h-IRT’s strength with maximum noise suppression around 50% (48.2-53.9%). Similar noise reduction was achieved on the scanners by applying specific h-IRT strengths. Maximum noise reduction on MB-IRTs was higher (68.3-81.1%) than that on h-IRTs (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

By using constant scan parameters, radiation dose and image noise on FBP are similar for different manufacturer CT scanners. Significant image noise reduction is achieved on low-dose CT images rendered with IRTs. The image noise on various scanners can be matched by applying specific h-IRTs strengths. MB-IRTs attain substantially higher noise reduction over h-IRTs irrespective of the radiation dose.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

This study lends the opportunity to understand the impact of various IRTs and influence of their strengths on the image noise. Since implementation of these techniques in clinical practice can be complex, this experience can assist in optimizing abdomen CT protocols with standard and modified dose scan parameters.

Cite This Abstract

Patino, M, Fuentes, J, Hayano, K, Kambadakone, A, Uyeda, J, Sahani, D, A Quantitative Comparison of Noise Reduction across Five Commercial (Hybrid and Model Based) Iterative Reconstruction Techniques: An Anthropomorphic Phantom Study.  Radiological Society of North America 2014 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, - ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2014/14010948.html