RSNA 2014 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2014


SSG14-04

Automated Selection of the Optimal Cardiac Phase for Single-beat Coronary CT Angiography

Scientific Papers

Presented on December 2, 2014
Presented as part of SSG14: Physics (Computed Tomography III: Image Quality, Performance, Evaluation)

Participants

Daniel Stassi, Presenter: Research funded, General Electric Company
Sandeep Dutta PhD, Abstract Co-Author: Employee, General Electric Company
Ann Soderman, Abstract Co-Author: Employee, General Electric company
Dave Pazzani, Abstract Co-Author: Employee, General Electric company
Darin R. Okerlund MS, Abstract Co-Author: Employee, General Electric Company
Taly Gilat Schmidt PhD, Abstract Co-Author: Research funded, General Electric Company

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate an automated algorithm for selecting the optimal cardiac phase for CCTA reconstruction. Reconstructing a low-motion cardiac phase improves coronary artery visualization in coronary CT angiography (CCTA) exams.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

An automated algorithm was developed to select the optimal phase based on quantitative image quality (IQ) metrics. For each reconstructed slice at each reconstructed phase, an image quality metric was calculated based on measures of circularity and edge strength of through-plane vessels. The image quality metric was aggregated across slices, while a metric of vessel-location consistency was used to ignore slices that did not contain through-plane vessels. The algorithm performance was evaluated using two observer studies. Fourteen single-beat CCTA exams (Revolution CT, GE Healthcare) reconstructed at 2% intervals were evaluated for best systolic (1), diastolic (6), or systolic and diastolic phases (7) by three readers and the algorithm. Inter-reader (RR) and reader-algorithm (RA) agreement was calculated using the mean absolute difference (MAD) and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). A reader-consensus best phase was determined and compared to the algorithm selected phase. In cases where the algorithm and consensus best phases differed by more than 2%, IQ was scored by three readers using a 5pt Likert scale.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between RR and RA agreement for either MAD or CCC metrics (p>0.1). The algorithm phase was within 2% of the consensus phase in 76% of cases. There was no significant difference (p>0.1) between the IQ of the algorithm phase (4.06±0.73) and the consensus phase (4.11±0.76).

CONCLUSION

The proposed algorithm was statistically equivalent to a reader in selecting an optimal cardiac phase for CCTA exams. When reader and algorithm phases differed by >2%, IQ was statistically equivalent.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

By detecting the optimal phase for CCTA reconstruction, the proposed algorithm can improve coronary artery visualization in CCTA exams.

Cite This Abstract

Stassi, D, Dutta, S, Soderman, A, Pazzani, D, Okerlund, D, Schmidt, T, Automated Selection of the Optimal Cardiac Phase for Single-beat Coronary CT Angiography.  Radiological Society of North America 2014 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, - ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2014/14010717.html