RSNA 2014 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2014


SSE04-03

Initial Experience of Intelligent Boundary Registration in Coronary CTA

Scientific Papers

Presented on December 1, 2014
Presented as part of SSE04: Cardiac (Cardiovascular Angiography)

Participants

Yan Xing PhD, MD, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
wen ya liu, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Cunxue Pan PhD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Gulina Azhati, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Jun Dang, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
jing jing LI, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Haiting Ma, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Yan Wei Wang MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

PURPOSE

To investigate the feasibility of a novel intelligent boundary registration (IBR) technique to align stair-step artifacts in coronary CT angiography (CCTA).

METHOD AND MATERIALS

Twenty-one consecutive CCTA exams with varying degrees of coronary artery stair-step artifacts were retrospectively processed with IBR technique on workstation (Advantage Windows 4.6; GE Healthcare). Two observers evaluate stair-step artifacts on IBR on and off images on per-segment basis defined by the 15-segment American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines. The severity of stair-step artifacts was graded with a 5-point grading scale (1.severe, complete discontinuity of the proximal and distal portions of the coronary artery; 2.moderate, discontinuity >50% of the artery diameter; 3.slight, discontinuity 25%–50% of the diameter; 4.minimal, discontinuity <25% of the diameter; and 5.no stair-step artifact). Images scored 1 or 2 were considered non-assessable. Comparisons of variables were performed with Wilcoxon rank sum test and McNemar test.

RESULTS

A total of 50 stair-step artifacts were found (35 Right Coronary Artery, 12 Left Coronary Artery, 3 Left Circumflex Artery). Images with IBR on processing were rated as significantly higher image scores versus those with IBR off (Average Image score: 4.42 ±1.13 vs 2.94 ±1.10);  (Z=5.681, P=0.000). Stair-step artifacts were fully corrected (Image score = 5 with IBR) in 70% (35/50) of all segments. Images with IBR off processing were rated as significantly higher non-assessable segments versus those with IBR on (Non-assessable rate: 34% vs 10% ); (χ2=8.392, P=0.004).

CONCLUSION

This novel IBR technique is feasible to reduce the severity of stair-step artifacts and increase assessable segments in CCTA.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

The use of IBR technique may reduce the number and severity of stair-step artifacts in CCTA, potentially increasing diagnostic confidence.  

Cite This Abstract

Xing, Y, liu, w, Pan, C, Azhati, G, Dang, J, LI, j, Ma, H, Wang, Y, Initial Experience of Intelligent Boundary Registration in Coronary CTA.  Radiological Society of North America 2014 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, - ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2014/14010619.html