RSNA 2014 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2014


SSJ19-04

Delayed Complications after Flow-diverter Stenting: Reactive In-stent Stenosis and Creeping Stents  

Scientific Papers

Presented on December 2, 2014
Presented as part of SSJ19: Neuroradiology (Neurointerventional Radiology)

Participants

John Moshe Gomori MD, Presenter: Consultant, Medymatch Technology Ltd
Jose Enrique Cohen MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

PURPOSE

Assess the frequency and severity of changes in stent configuration and location, and patterns of in-stent stenosis of flow diverter stents.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

: Retrospective review of consecutive data from October 2011 to July 2012 of Silk flow diverter [Balt Extrusion, Montmorency, France] and Pipeline embolization device [ev3/Coviden, Minneapolis, MN, USA]. Routine 2, 6, 9–12, and 16–20 month follow-up angiograms were compared, with a focus on changes between stent configuration and location immediately after deployment and on angiographic follow-up, and the incidence and development of in-stent stenosis.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients with 42 aneurysms met inclusion criteria. The Silk device was implanted in 16 patients (47%, single device in 15), the Pipeline device in 18 (53%, single device in 16). On first follow-up angiography, in-stent stenosis was observed in 38% of Silk devices and 39% of Pipeline devices. In-stent stenosis was asymptomatic 12/13 patients. One woman presented with transient ischemic attacks and required stent angioplasty due to end tapering and mild, diffuse in-stent stenosis. Configuration and location changes such as stent creeping and end tapering were seen in 2/16 patients (13%) with Silk devices, and 0/18 patients with Pipeline devices. We describe stent creeping and end tapering among the unusual findings with potential for delayed clinical complications.

CONCLUSION

In-stent stenosis, with a unique behavior, is a frequent angiographic finding observed after flow-diverter stent implant. The stenosis is usually asymptomatic; however, close clinical and angiographic monitoring is mandatory for individualized management. Stent creeping and end tapering is more common with Silk devices.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

Silk diverter stents are less stable than Pipeline devices. Both devices show instent stenosis and need careful monitoring. 

Cite This Abstract

Gomori, J, Cohen, J, Delayed Complications after Flow-diverter Stenting: Reactive In-stent Stenosis and Creeping Stents  .  Radiological Society of North America 2014 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, - ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2014/14008795.html