RSNA 2014 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2014


GUS133

Diagnostic Performance of Dual Energy MDCT with Iodine Quantification for Differentiating Clear Cell from Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma

Scientific Posters

Presented on December 3, 2014
Presented as part of GUS-WEA: Genitourinary/Uroradiology Wednesday Poster Discussions

 Trainee Research Prize - Fellow

Participants

Achille Mileto MD, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Daniele Marin MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Alfredo Blandino, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Juan Carlos Ramirez Giraldo PhD, Abstract Co-Author: Employee, Siemens AG
Christian Eusemann PhD, Abstract Co-Author: Employee, Siemens AG
Emanuele Scribano, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Giorgio Ascenti MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

PURPOSE

To investigate the diagnostic performance of dual energy MDCT with iodine quantification for distinguishing clear cell from papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

METHOD AND MATERIALS

Eighty-eight patients (57 men, 31 women), with diagnosis of either clear cell or papillary RCC at pathology, underwent contrast-enhanced dual-energy nephrographic phase study between December 2007 and June 2013. Five readers, blinded to pathologic diagnosis, independently evaluated all cases by determining the lesion iodine concentration on color-coded iodine maps. The receiving operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was adopted to estimate the optimal threshold for discriminating between clear cell and papillary RCC. Inter-observer agreement was assessed using the k test. The correlation between tumor iodine concentration and tumor grade was investigated.

RESULTS

A tumor iodine concentration of 0.9 mg/mL represented the optimal threshold for discriminating between clear cell and papillary RCC, yielding sensitivity of 98.2% (95% CI: 97.7%, 98.7%), specificity of 86.3% (95% CI: 85.0%, 87.7%), positive predictive value of 95.8% (95% CI: 95.0%, 96.6%), negative predictive value of 93.7% (95% CI: 92.8%, 94.7%), area under the curve of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.91 , 0.93), with overall accuracy of 95.3% (95% CI: 94.6%, 96.2%). Substantial agreement was found among the five readers (k, 0.79). Significant correlation was found between tumor iodine concentration and tumor grade for both clear cell (τ = .85; P <.001) and papillary RCC (τ = .53; P <.001).

CONCLUSION

Dual energy MDCT with iodine quantification enables a highly accurate and reliable distinction between clear cell and papillary RCC at a single-time-point.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

By virtue of the noninvasive discrimination between clear cell and papillary RCC, dual energy iodine quantification may streamline patients’ management while, potentially, serving as an in-vivo prognostic imaging biomarker in predicting survival.

Cite This Abstract

Mileto, A, Marin, D, Blandino, A, Ramirez Giraldo, J, Eusemann, C, Scribano, E, Ascenti, G, Diagnostic Performance of Dual Energy MDCT with Iodine Quantification for Differentiating Clear Cell from Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma.  Radiological Society of North America 2014 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, - ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2014/14007995.html