RSNA 2014 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2014


CHE143

Dual Energy CT (DECT) in Thoracic Oncology: Qualitative and Quantitative Evaluation

Education Exhibits

Presented in 2014

Participants

Roberto Lo Gullo MD, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Alexi Otrakji MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Subba Rao Digumarthy MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Noah Chan H. Choi MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Jo-Anne O. Shepard MD, Abstract Co-Author: Consultant, Agfa-Gevaert Group
Mannudeep K. S. Kalra MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Ranish Deedar Ali Khawaja MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Sarabjeet Singh MD, Abstract Co-Author: Research Grant, Siemens AG Research Grant, Toshiba Corporation Research Grant, General Electric Company Research Grant, Koninklijke Philips NV
Atul Padole MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Sarvenaz Pourjabbar MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Diego Alfonso Lira MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

TEACHING POINTS

Recent publications and our experience suggest role of DECT in thoracic malignancies for differentiating benign versus malignant lesions as well as for assessing treatment response. Teaching points of our educational exhibit are A. Specific scanning protocol and contrast injection delay time are required for evaluation of patients with intrathoracic masses with DECT. B. Use of DECT datasets to generate blended, monoenergetic and perfused blood volume image types C. Differences between the qualitative interpretations of DECT datasets versus single energy chest CT. D. Role of quantitative indexes of contrast uptake in the thoracic masses from DECT datasets in characterization of thoracic masses. E. Role of DECT for assessing treatment response F. Radiation dose with DECT can be similar to single energy routine chest CT protocols.  

TABLE OF CONTENTS/OUTLINE

1. Scanning protocol and contrast injection techniques 2. Image processing of DECT datasets 3. Qualitative evaluation of processed images 4. Quantitative metrics of DECT in thoracic oncology: Relative contrast enhancement and iodine concentration 5. Advantages and limitations 6. Pictorial depiction of teaching points with series of cases from our institution  

PDF UPLOAD

http://abstract.rsna.org/uploads/2014/14007357/14007357_sw58.pdf

Cite This Abstract

Lo Gullo, R, Otrakji, A, Digumarthy, S, Choi, N, Shepard, J, Kalra, M, Khawaja, R, Singh, S, Padole, A, Pourjabbar, S, Lira, D, Dual Energy CT (DECT) in Thoracic Oncology: Qualitative and Quantitative Evaluation.  Radiological Society of North America 2014 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, - ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2014/14007357.html