RSNA 2014 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2014


SSK06-05

Wirsungocele and Santorinicele: MRCP Findings and Clinical Outcomes

Scientific Papers

Presented on December 3, 2014
Presented as part of SSK06: Gastrointestinal (Pancreas Benign Disease)

Participants

Ybao Liu MD, PhD, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Fatih Akisik MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Kumaresan Sandrasegaran MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Temel Tirkes MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Mark Tann MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Chang Hong Liang MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Chen Lin PhD, Abstract Co-Author: Research Grant, Siemens AG

PURPOSE

To retrospectively investigate the value of MRCP in detecting wirsungocele and santorinicele, correlation with chronic or acute pancreatitis, as well as comparison with ERCP and EUS results.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

This retrospective HIPAA-compliant and IRP proven study, with waiver of informed consent, included 80 patients (61 santoriniceles, 18 wirsungoceles and 1 both santorinicele and wirsungocele).14 of 80 patients underwent only MRCP exams while 66 of 80 patients underwent S-MRCP exams. Analyzing the sizes of santorinicele and wirsungocele, comparing the sensitivity and specificity of MRCP and S-MRCP in detecting santorinicele and wirsungocele, analyzing whether santorinicele and wirsungocele are correlated with pancreas divisum, chronic or acute pancreatitis, and compared the results with ERCP and EUS findings.Statistical analysis included χ2 test, Fisher’s exact probability procedures. A value of p<.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

The study subjects consisted of 80 patients (21 male and 59 female; mean age at time of diagnosis, 55 years; range, 11-82 years). Size of wirsungocele (N=18) 4.5 ± 1.7 mm and santorinicele (N=62) 3.6 ± 0.8 mm. There was significant difference between MRCP and S-MRCP in detecting santorinicele, 68 % and 92 % (p <.05), and wirsungocele was 52 % and 99 % (p <.05).  There was a significant correlation between santorinicele and chronic pancreatitis, 51% had chronic pancreatitis, and 8 % had acute pancreatitis. 11% wirsungocele patients had chronic pancreatitis and none had clinical diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. 

CONCLUSION

MRCP is useful in identifying wirsungocele and santorinicele. Secretin increases the sensitivity of the exam. Chronic or acute pancreatitis are more common in the patient with a santorinicele than in a patient with a wirsungocele.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

The diagnosis of santorinicele is important as there is a correlation with acute and chronic pancreatitis as opposed to a wirsungocele.

Cite This Abstract

Liu, Y, Akisik, F, Sandrasegaran, K, Tirkes, T, Tann, M, Liang, C, Lin, C, Wirsungocele and Santorinicele: MRCP Findings and Clinical Outcomes.  Radiological Society of North America 2014 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, - ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2014/14006841.html