Maria Paramo Alfaro MD, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose

Maite Millor MEd, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

Pablo Daniel Dominguez MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

Romina Zalazar MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

Maria De Los Reyes Garcia de Eulate, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

Jaime Gallego Perez-Larraya, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

Jose Luis Zubieta, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

1.- To review the history of response assessment criteria for high-grade Gliomas    1.1 Macdonald Criteria (1990)    1.2 Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (2000) [RECIST]    1.3 RECIST version 1.1 (2009) 2.- To analize the advantages and limitations of each group of criteria and to compare them 3.- To explain important modern concepts    3.1 Pseudoprogression    3.2 Pseudoresponse 4.-  The Response Assessment in Neuro-oncology working group [RANO]    4.1 RANO vs RECIST

Hystory revision of response assessment criteria for high-grade Gliomas MacDonald  RECIST (v 1.0) RECIST (v 1.1) RANO Differences and changes between them Important concepts (review of imaging findings and sample cases) Pseudoprogression Pseudoresponse Future directions and summary 

http://abstract.rsna.org/uploads/2014/14006674/14006674_78ih.pdf

Paramo Alfaro, M, Millor, M, Dominguez, P, Zalazar, R, Garcia de Eulate, M, Gallego Perez-Larraya, J, Zubieta, J, Response Assessment Criteria in Neuro-Oncology: Past, Present and Future.  Radiological Society of North America 2014 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, - ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2014/14006674.html