RSNA/ARR Study Section Reviewers Workshop What It Takes to Be an Expert Reviewer for the NIH: The Peer Review Process Demystified

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2014

SPRW01

RSNA/ARR Study Section Reviewers Workshop What It Takes to Be an Expert Reviewer for the NIH: The Peer Review Process Demystified

Special Courses — Research and Statistical Methods,

Presented on November 29, 2014

Participants

Elizabeth Anne Krupinski PhD, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose

Carolyn C. Meltzer MD, Presenter: Board of Directors, ACR Image Metrix

Kathryn A. Morton MD, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

1) Identify the different grant mechanisms available within the NIH and the requirements for submitting to a particular mechanism. 2) List the criteria used in the evaluation of NIH grants and what happens prior to and during a study section review meeting. 3) Articulate the benefits of being a reviewer for the NIH and the different ways that one can be a reviewer. 4) Observe a mock study section presented by the NIH with experienced reviewers evaluating at least two grant mechanisms.

Sub-Events

SPRW01A	Welcome and Introductory Remarks
SPRW01B	The New Peer Review Process: Changes, Challenges and Opportunities
SPRW01C	Review Criteria: Varying Emphasis by Grant Mechanism
SPRW01D	Getting on a Study Section: How, Why, and Which One?
SPRW01E	Panel Discussion/Q&A
SPRW01F	Reviewing for Other Organizations
SPRW01G	Mock Study Section (Joint Session with NIH Grantsmanship Workshop Faculty)
SPRW01H	Closing Comments/Evaluations

Cite This Abstract

Krupinski, E, Meltzer, C, Morton, K, RSNA/ARR Study Section Reviewers Workshop What It Takes to Be an Expert Reviewer for the NIH: The Peer Review Process Demystified . Radiological Society of North America 2014 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, - ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2014/14006189.html