RSNA 2014 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2014


SSC03-08

Automatic Classification of Perifissural Pulmonary Nodules in Thoracic CT Images

Scientific Papers

Presented on December 1, 2014
Presented as part of SSC03: Chest (Lung Nodule)

Participants

Francesco Ciompi PhD, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Bartjan De Hoop MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Colin Jacobs MSc, Abstract Co-Author: Research Grant, MeVis Medical Solutions AG
Mathias Prokop MD, PhD, Abstract Co-Author: Speakers Bureau, Bayer AG Speakers Bureau, Bracco Group Speakers Bureau, Toshiba Corporation Speakers Bureau, Koninklijke Philips NV Research Grant, Toshiba Corporation
Pim A. De Jong MD, PhD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Bram Van Ginneken PhD, Abstract Co-Author: Stockholder, Thirona BV Co-founder, Thirona BV Research Grant, MeVis Medical Solutions AG Research Grant, Canon Inc Research Grant, Toshiba Corporation Research Grant, Riverain Technologies, LLC

PURPOSE

Up to one third of pulmonary nodules detected in heavy smokers are perifissural nodules (PFNs) that do not require follow-up. An automatic method is presented to distinguish PFNs from solid nodules.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

We used all baseline scans with a pulmonary nodule from one of the sites of the NELSON trial. All participants were either current or former heavy smokers (age between 50 and 75 years), and underwent low-dose CT (Mx8000 IDT 16; Philips Medical Systems, Cleveland, Ohio). Experts annotated non-calcified solid nodules in 1,729 scans, and classified these as PFN (788) and non-PFN (3,038). We formulated PFN classification as a machine learning problem where a classifier is trained to automatically label nodules as PFN or non-PFN. Given the characteristic triangular-like shape of PFNs, a novel descriptor encoding information on nodule morphology was designed. The descriptor is based on frequency analysis of intensity profiles sampled in the CT image. Given a detected nodule, spherical surfaces up to a maximum radius R are considered, centered on the center of mass of the nodule. For each sphere, the image intensity is sampled along C circular profiles on the surface of each sphere at constant angular distance. The profiles are interpreted as a periodic signal, and their spectrum is obtained using a Fast Fourier Transform. Each spectrum encodes information on nodule morphology through characteristic frequencies. A set of K spectral signatures is computed applying K-means on the collection of spectra. A compact nodule descriptor is obtained as the histogram of spectral signatures along the spheres. A Random Forests classifier with 100 trees was used for supervised learning. A 10-folds cross-validation scheme was applied to evaluate the method on the 3,826 nodules, using C=128, K=100. Since the range of PFNs diameters is 2.8-10.6 mm, we used R = 7.5 mm.

RESULTS

We obtained a value of area under the ROC curve of 0.85, with an optimal operating point of 77% sensitivity and 79% specificity. Misclassified PFNs were often close to the pleura or to other vascular structures.

CONCLUSION

Classification of pulmonary nodules as PFN is feasible and has the potential to be used as an automatic tool in CAD.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

PFNs rarely turn out to be malignant, even though their growth rate is similar to that of malignant nodules. Automatic recognition of PFNs could reduce the number of unnecessary follow-up CT exams.

Cite This Abstract

Ciompi, F, De Hoop, B, Jacobs, C, Prokop, M, De Jong, P, Van Ginneken, B, Automatic Classification of Perifissural Pulmonary Nodules in Thoracic CT Images.  Radiological Society of North America 2014 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, - ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2014/14005573.html