Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2014
Series Courses
IR CAIR CAAMA PRA Category 1 Credits ™: 3.25
ARRT Category A+ Credits: 4.00
Mon, Dec 1 8:30 AM - 12:00 PM Location: S404CD
Participants
Sub-Events
1) To understand the typical Implantation techniques used in TAVI. 2) To learn the infomation that the interventionalist requires from pre-procedural Imaging in order to optimize the Implantation procedure. 3) To appreciate the relevance of pre-procedural imaging for prosthesis selection and outcome.
Aortic valve calcium is a predictor for aortic regurgitation (AR) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and is associated with adverse outcome. 2nd generation devices promise to reduce residual AR, so we evaluated aortic valve calcium and post-procedual AR in 1st and 2nd generation transcatheter aortic valves as well as among different 2nd generation devices.
TAVI was performed using 1st and 2nd generation devices in 156 patients with severe aortic stenosis and high surgical risk. Devices implanted were Edwards SapienXT(n=52), Medtronic CoreValve (n=33), Symetis Acurate(n=25), JenaValve(n=20) and Medtronic Engager(n=26) valves. All patients received preoperative contrast-enhanced CT scans with prospective ECG gating. 3D-reconstructions were performed by 3Mensio software (3MensioMedical Imaging, Bilthoven).Calcium load was quantified within the device-landing area, sub-divided into zone 1 (left coronary artery ostium to aortic annulus and zone 2 (aortic annulus to 10mm below). A cutoff of 500HU was used to distinguish aortic calcium from intraluminal contrast agent. In another group of 138 patients receiving 2nd generation devices only, aortic calcium was measured separately for each leaflet and compared among all implanted devices with regard to residual AR.
TAVI using 1st and 2nd generation devices revealed good hemodynamic results, irrespective of annular calcification. CoreValve was associated with highest rate of AR greater trace, while Engager valve, mostly used in patients with higher calcium load, showed no difference in post-procedural AR.
1) Review the role of MDCT and TEE for annular sizing and device selection. 2) Discuss the role of pre-procedural CT in identifying patients at risk of TAVR related complications such as coronary occlusion and annular rupture. 3) Discuss the evolving role of MDCT to help guide transcatheter valve in valve procedures.
Cardiac CT is able to evaluate coronary artery disease with high diagnostic accuracy and provide comprehensive information regarding structural heart disease. Due to its ability to reconstruct 3-dimensional images with submilimeter isotropic resolution, cardiac CT is a uniquely suited tool for planning and appropriate selection of coronary and non-coronary interventional procedures. The detailed characterisation of coronary geometry and plaque morphology might improve the evaluation of bifurcation lesions and provide important information regarding selection of CTO PCI technique. The application of computational fluid dynamic simulation in CT datasets provides novel avenues in PCI planning through virtual stenting and post-stenting CT-derived computed fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) assessment. Other structural heart interventions might benefit from CT planning, like the evaluation of left atrial appendage, paravalvular leak and atrial or ventricular septal defects in patients candidate for closure devices.
Reduce the iodine load required for CT TAVI planning by acquiring the ECG-gated aortic root volume and the non-gated aortoiliac scan within the same single contrast media bolus injection.
Second-generation 320-row CT scanner enables a 47% reduction of the iodine load in TAVI planning, by subsequently acquiring the ECG-gated aortic root and the CAP aorta within a single contrast media bolus injection, while maintaining excellent aortoiliac arterial enhancement and lowering radiation dose.
TAVI planning with subsequent acquisition of the ECG-gated aortic root and the non-gated whole-body aorta is possible within a single contrast media injection when using a 320-row CT.
Detailed analysis of aortic root geometry reveals normal asymmetry in the aortic sinus and leaflet surface area. The size of left coronary sinus was smaller than the other two sinuses. The size of aortic sinus showed increasing tendency in older age group, however LSA did not changed with age.
Knowledge of the normal aortic root anatomy is relevant to understand the pathophysiology of the aortic regurgitation and to improve the method of surgical aortic root reconstruction.
The shape of the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), aortic annulus and aortic root may impact the proper sizing of a percutaneous aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We evaluated the sphericity of left ventricular outflow with ECG-gated coronary CTA from the LVOT through the sinotubular junction in both diastole and systole.
ECG-gated CTA studies were reviewed from 52 consecutive patients with normal aortic valves and 13 TAVR candidates with severe aortic stenosis and dense valvular calcification. Using a dedicated 3D workstation, orthogonal measurements of the outflow tract were obtained to define the antero-posterior (AP) and transverse diameters (short and long axis) at 4 levels: LVOT, aortic annulus, aortic root and sinotubular junction. Sphericity was defined as the ratio of the AP to transverse diameter at each level.
The shape of the left ventricular outflow changes from an oval at the level of the LVOT to a more circular shape at the level of the sinotubular junction. Although the entire outflow tract changes in size and sphericity during the cardiac cycle, this change is most pronounced at the LVOT, and is statistically significant only at the LVOT and aortic annulus levels. The sphericity of left ventricular outflow structures and the change in sphericity during the cardiac cycle is similar among patients with a normal aortic valve and those with severe aortic stenosis.
The oval shape of the proximal left ventricular outflow is not altered by the presence of aortic stenosis and calcification. This shape may have important implications for the design and positioning of aortic valve implants.
Patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) typically undergo a CT study of the heart, aortic root and vascular access route for pre-interventional planning. In this study we evaluated the accuracy of cardiac CT, performed for TAVR planning purposes for diagnosing obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) using coronary catheter angiography (CCA) as the reference standard.
Our study indicates that TAVR planning CT does indeed have high sensitivity and negative predictive value in excluding obstructive CAD. For prospective TAVR candidates this would suggest that an additional pre-procedural CCA study may not be required in those patients with a CT negative for obstructive CAD.
Our analysis suggests a new management algorithm that would benefit the rising numbers of TAVR candidates with increases in cost effectiveness and improvements in patient safety.
Cite This Abstract