RSNA 2014 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2014


RC218B

Prostate Cancer Treatment Assessment

Refresher/Informatics

Presented on December 1, 2014
Presented as part of RC218: Imaging Tumor Response: Old and New Challenges

Participants

Hedvig Hricak MD, PhD, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

1) Understand the clinical challenges of prostate cancer post-treatment follow-up and the role of imaging in detecting local recurrence. 2) Know how MRI protocols for detecting local recurrence should be adjusted depending on the prior treatment and the questions being asked. 3) Understand standard and emerging uses of bone scanning, PET/CT and MRI/PET for detecting metastasis.

ABSTRACT

MRI has emerged as the key modality for assessing local recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiation therapy (RT). Early detection of local recurrence is important to allow potentially curative salvage therapy. The efficacy of MRI in detecting local recurrence is treatment dependent, and MRI protocols need to be adjusted to the questions being asked. After RT, T2-weighted MRI is limited due to post-radiation effects on the prostate such as glandular shrinkage, loss of normal zonal anatomy, and reduced contrast between cancer and normal tissue caused by glandular atrophy and fibrosis. MRI should include both T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted sequences; a recent study suggested that in most patients, dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI could be omitted after RT without lowering diagnostic performance, thereby eliminating the risks and costs associated with the use of contrast. If salvage treatment is an option after RT, MRI offers loco-regional staging. Post-RT MRI can evaluate the length of the urethra and may show urethral shortening (which has been associated with incontinence after primary RP), decreased urethral margin definition and other tissue changes that could conceivably affect treatment selection and planning. After surgery, in addition to DWI, the use of DCE-MRI is essential, as it can show small lesions and differentiate tumor from scarring. MRI may help to determine whether post-RP local recurrence is amenable to salvage RT and may aid RT planning. Assessment of recurrence after emerging focal therapies remains problematic, since methods for reliably differentiating necrosis or scarring from tumor are lacking. In the future, PET/CT with targeted tracers may be able to address this need. PET/CT and bone scanning are valuable in the search for nodal and osseous metastases, respectively. The implementation of clinical MRI/PET and the use of new tracers will likely open new horizons in the assessment of recurrence.

Cite This Abstract

Hricak, H, Prostate Cancer Treatment Assessment.  Radiological Society of North America 2014 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, - ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2014/14000595.html