RSNA 2014 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2014


RC322A

Pelvis

Refresher/Informatics

Presented on December 2, 2014
Presented as part of RC322: Uncertainties in Imaging for Radiation Oncology: Sources and Mitigation Techniques—Site-specific IGRT Applications: Impact of Different Approaches on Uncertainties

Participants

Emilie Soisson PhD, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

1) Be able to describe the sources and magnitude of positional uncertainty in irradiation of the pelvis. 2) Understand the role of image guidance in localizing pelvic targets. 3) Be able to compare the imaging strategies employed in the pelvis and understand residual uncertainties associated with each system. 4) Be able to compare published results with their own clinical practice.

ABSTRACT

Detection of organ motion is required for accurate targeting in radiation therapy of the pelvis. It is well known that pelvic targets change size, shape, and location as a result of changes in bladder and rectal filling and the size and location of these organs on the planning CT cannot be easily reproduced at treatment. While organ filling can be partially controlled through dietary regulation, complete immobilization is not possible. Image guidance (IGRT) provides the opportunity to monitor inter- and intra-fraction anatomical changes to better ensure plan delivery accuracy. In turn, IGRT has allowed for margin reduction and dose escalation, especially in the case of the prostate. The potential reduction in margin is then dependent on several factors including the ability to visualize the target and the frequency of imaging. Since target anatomy is generally not rigid with respect to boney landmarks, images used for localization must provide adequate soft tissue contrast or be used in combination with implanted surrogates. Due to the variety of IGRT approaches available and the possibility of having more than one imaging system in each treatment vault, it is now possible to inter-compare different localization methods to determine the uncertainty of a particular approach. Results of these studies are surprising and suggest that even though we think we can see the prostate with our chosen image guidance strategy, back-to-back imaging with different modalities will likely reveal that the prostate not only a different size but also often in a different place. In addition, intra-fraction motion is considerable in the prostate indicating that significant margins are might be required in the absence of intra-fraction tracking.

Cite This Abstract

Soisson, E, Pelvis.  Radiological Society of North America 2014 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, - ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2014/12020062.html