RSNA 2013 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2013


SSM02-04

Breast MRI as a Problem-solving Tool in the Evaluation of Mammographically and Ultrasonographically Detected Architectural Distortions: Are There Any Predictive Parameters?

Scientific Formal (Paper) Presentations

Presented on December 4, 2013
Presented as part of SSM02: Breast Imaging (Multimodality Breast Imaging)

Participants

Rubina Noemi Cavallin, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Claudio Losio MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Marta Maria Panzeri, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Elena Venturini MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Giulia Cristel MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Alessandro Del Maschio MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

PURPOSE

Despite accounting for only 3% of mammographically detected findings, architectural distortion (AD) may be caused by a wide range of benign and malignant breast lesions, and it is the 3rd most common presentation of non palpable breast cancer. Because of its indefinite mammographic and ultrasonographic features, percutaneous or surgical biopsy is mandatory. In our study we evaluated the potential role of dynamic Breast MRI including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) as a problem-solving tool in mammographically and ultrasonographically detected AD

METHOD AND MATERIALS

Out of 232 patients undergoing MRI for problem solving, 34 were examined for a mammographic or ultrasonographic AD. MRI (1.5T) included T2-TSE sequences, dynamic study and DWI (b-values: 0, 900 s/mm2). For each lesion detected we evaluated morphology, dynamic and diffusion patterns and final histopathological result. A cut-off ADC value differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions had been previously established in a large population of women. The difference between the mean Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) values and the mean T2 signal in malignant and benign findings was evaluated with Mann-Whitney U test. Univariate and multivariate analyses of ADC values, T2 signal and time-enhancement curves (T-Ec)  were performed for prediction of malignancy.  

RESULTS

MRI confirmed all 38 known findings. At histopathology 25 lesions were benign and 13 malignant. The most represented T-Ec in malignant AD were type 3 (n=7) and 2 (n=3), while no benign lesions showed a washout kinetic. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that T-Ec were significant predictors of malignancy (p<0.05). Quantitative DWI assessed a mean ADC value of 1.31x10-3mm2/s in benign lesions, higher than in malignant lesions (1.20x10-3mm2/s, p<0.05). ADC values were significant for predicting malignancy with use of univariate (p<0.05) but not multivariate analysis (p=0.08). T2 values were not predictors of malignancy.  

CONCLUSION

Time-enhancement curves were the most predictive MRI feature to distinguish benign from malignant AD. The contribution of DWI to their differential diagnosis is limited due to ADC borderline values. MRI low negative predictive value, however, suggests to avoid MRI to strengthen the diagnosis after a benign core biopsy.  

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

MRI could not replace breast biopsy to confirm the nature of architectural distortions.  

Cite This Abstract

Cavallin, R, Losio, C, Panzeri, M, Venturini, E, Cristel, G, Del Maschio, A, Breast MRI as a Problem-solving Tool in the Evaluation of Mammographically and Ultrasonographically Detected Architectural Distortions: Are There Any Predictive Parameters?.  Radiological Society of North America 2013 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, December 1 - December 6, 2013 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2013/13027477.html