RSNA 2013 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2013


SST07-04

The Value of Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Interdisciplinary Treatment of Pelvic Floor Dysfunction

Scientific Formal (Paper) Presentations

Presented on December 6, 2013
Presented as part of SST07: Genitourinary (Anatomy and Dysfunction of the Female Pelvic Floor)

Participants

Ulrike I. Attenberger MD, Presenter: Research Consultant, Bayer AG
John Nicholas Morelli MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Alexander Herold, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Peter Kienle MD, PhD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Werner Kleine, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Axel Hacker, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Christopher Baumann, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Julia Heinzelbecker, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Stefan Oswald Schoenberg MD, PhD, Abstract Co-Author: Institutional research agreement, Siemens AG
Henrik J. Michaely MD, Abstract Co-Author: Speakers Bureau, Siemens AG Speakers Bureau, Bayer AG Speakers Bureau, Guerbet SA

PURPOSE

To determine the value of dynamic pelvic floor MRI relative to standard clinical examinations in treatment decisions made by an interdisciplinary team of specialists in a center for pelvic floor dysfunction

METHOD AND MATERIALS

60 women were included in this IRB approved retrospective analysis. All patients were referred for dynamic pelvic floor MRI by an interdisciplinary team of specialists of a pelvic floor center. All patients were clinically examined by an urologist, gynecologist, a proctological and colorectal surgeon. The specialists assessed individually and in consensus, whether (1) MRI provides important additional information not evident by physical examination and in consensus whether (2) MRI influenced the treatment strategy and/or (3) changed management or the surgical procedure.

RESULTS

MRI was rated essential in the treatment decisions of 22/50 cases, leading to a treatment change in 13 cases. In 12 cases, an enterocele was diagnosed by MRI but was not detected on physical exam. In 4 cases an enterocele and in 2 cases a rectocele were suspected clinically but not confirmed by MRI. In 4 cases, MRI proved critical in assessment of rectocele size. Vaginal intussusception detected on MRI was likewise missed by gynecologic exam in 1 case.

CONCLUSION

MRI allows diagnosis of clinically occult enteroceles, by comprehensively evaluating the interaction between the pelvic floor and viscera. In nearly half of cases, MRI changed management or the surgical approach relative to the clinical evaluation of an interdisciplinary team. Thus, dynamic pelvic floor MRI represents an essential component of the evaluation for pelvic floor disorders.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

In an interdisciplinary center for pelvic floor disorders dynamic pelvic floor MRI leads to a significant change in clinical management

Cite This Abstract

Attenberger, U, Morelli, J, Herold, A, Kienle, P, Kleine, W, Hacker, A, Baumann, C, Heinzelbecker, J, Schoenberg, S, Michaely, H, The Value of Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Interdisciplinary Treatment of Pelvic Floor Dysfunction.  Radiological Society of North America 2013 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, December 1 - December 6, 2013 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2013/13017928.html