RSNA 2013 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2013


LL-GIS-TH3B

MR Prediction of Tumor Grade in Rectal Cancer Using Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer Imaging

Scientific Informal (Poster) Presentations

Presented on December 5, 2013
Presented as part of LL-GIS-THB: Gastrointestinal - Thursday Posters and Exhibits (12:45pm - 1:15pm)

Participants

Akihiro Nishie MD, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Yoshiki Asayama MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Yasuhiro Ushijima MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Yukihisa Takayama MD, Abstract Co-Author: Research Grant, Bayer AG Research Grant, Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV
Nobuhiro Fujita MD, PhD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Hiroshi Honda MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Dai Shimamoto, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Osamu Togao MD, PhD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Takashi Yoshiura MD, PhD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Makoto Obara, Abstract Co-Author: Employee, Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV
Jochen Keupp PhD, Abstract Co-Author: Employee, Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV

PURPOSE

To elucidate if chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging can predict tumor grade of rectal cancer and to investigate the feasibility of this new MR sequence for predict malignant potential

METHOD AND MATERIALS

A total of ten patients with rectal cancer who underwent MR examination including CEST imaging were enrolled. CEST imaging was scanned with single-shot 2D TSE-DRIVE on a 3T clinical scanner (Achieva TX 3.0T, Philips Healthcare, NL) using a 32-channel SENSE Torso/Cardiac coil and 2-channel parallel transmission. The sequence parameters were as follows: Tsat=0.5 s, TR/TE=5000/6 ms, FOV=230 mm2, spatial resolution=1.8×1.8×5 mm3, 25 saturation frequency offsets S[ω], ω = -6.0 to +6.0 ppm (step 0.5 ppm) and S0 (ω=-160 ppm), affording 2 minutes scanning time. ΔB0 correction was also performed. MTR asymmetry (MTRasym) was defined as: MTRasym = {Ssat(−offset)−Ssat(+offset)}/S0, where Ssat and S0 are signal intensities on the images with presaturation pulse at -6.0 to +6.0 ppm and control (160 ppm). The calculated MTRasym map at the offset of 3.5 ppm was generated, and region-of-interests were carefully placed in the entire area of each rectal cancer on this map to measure APT signal (%). Each tumor was also histologically divided into three tumor grades (well-, well- to moderately and moderately differentiated adenocarcinomas). The mean APT signal was compared among the three tumor grades using a Fisher’s least significant difference.

RESULTS

The mean APT signal of well-differentiated adenocarcinoma (n=2; 0.15+/-0.05%) was significantly lower than those of well- to moderately and moderately differentiated adenocarcinomas (n=3; 2.57+/-0.22% and n=5; 2.24+/-0.50%)(p<0.05). There was no significant difference in APT signal between well- to moderately and moderately differentiated adenocarcinomas.

CONCLUSION

CEST imaging can predict tumor grade of rectal cancer non-invasively.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

CEST imaging describes high ability to synthesize protein of cancer and may enable us to quantify tumor malignancy and proliferative potential. APT signal can be a new imaging biomarker of cancer.

Cite This Abstract

Nishie, A, Asayama, Y, Ushijima, Y, Takayama, Y, Fujita, N, Honda, H, Shimamoto, D, Togao, O, Yoshiura, T, Obara, M, Keupp, J, MR Prediction of Tumor Grade in Rectal Cancer Using Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer Imaging.  Radiological Society of North America 2013 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, December 1 - December 6, 2013 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2013/13017189.html