RSNA 2013 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2013


SSM02-03

Breast Cancer Invisible to Ultrasound: What Does the Ultrasound Show? Characteristics of MR Discovered Breast Cancers Not Recognized on Second-look Ultrasound Examination

Scientific Formal (Paper) Presentations

Presented on December 4, 2013
Presented as part of SSM02: Breast Imaging (Multimodality Breast Imaging)

Participants

Phillip Byron Shaffer MD, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose

PURPOSE

Investigate the US appearance of regions with postive MR scans later proven to be cancer.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

In our experience of 373 total MR directed biopsies, 33 patients were found who 1) had suspicious areas discovered on an MR and 2) had a second look US that was negative and 3) subsequently had a malignant diagnosis as a result of MR biopsy. This patient group is interesting because they were examined with prior knowledge of the precise locality of a suspicious lesion; nevertheless, the ultrasound was negative.

RESULTS

Of the 33 patients, 13 had a final diagnosis of DCIS, MR imaging size range 0.6 to 5.4 cm. 15 had a final diagnosis of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), MR imaging size range 0.7 to 12.0 cm. 4 had a final diagnosis of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), MR imaging size range 0.6 to 8.4 cm. There was one adenoid cystic carcinoma of 1.0 cm. On US examination by dedicated breast sonographers and experienced radiologists the pattern seen was judged to be not sufficiently suspicious to be certain of correlation with the MR. These were regarded as “negative” US exams. The pattern present on the ultrasound was closely examined in 30 patients (3 sets of images were not available), and divided by appearance into two groups: Group QP: which were in retrospect Questionably Positive, and Group B: Benign. In Group QP, two distinct patterns were observed: low echogenicity area (6 patients) and shadow without mass (8 patients). In Group B, three distinct patterns were seen: Normal tissue (7 pts), Heterogeneous without mass (4 pts), and small mass with benign characteristics (5 pts). When segregated by histology, the following was observed: IDC: Group QP- 10 pts Group B- 4 pts. ILC: Group QP- 2 pts Group B- 2 pts. DCIS: Group Q-2 pts Group B-10 pts.

CONCLUSION

Even when positive MR images direct the radiologist precisely to the area of high suspicion for malignancy, thus eliminating search errors, those malignancies may remain subtle or totally undetectable by the usual US criteria, even for tumors up to 12 cm in size. The ultrasonographic tissue characteristics of these tumors are simply indistinguishable from that of normal breast.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

Many breast cancers are unrecognizable on ultrasound. Even a totally normal ultrasound does not rule out breast malignancy.

Cite This Abstract

Shaffer, P, Breast Cancer Invisible to Ultrasound: What Does the Ultrasound Show? Characteristics of MR Discovered Breast Cancers Not Recognized on Second-look Ultrasound Examination.  Radiological Society of North America 2013 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, December 1 - December 6, 2013 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2013/13014105.html