RSNA 2012 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2012


LL-MKS-TU5D

Facet Space Map Comparison of Femorotibial and Patellofemoral Joint Surfaces between Knee OA Patients and Healthy Subjects

Scientific Informal (Poster) Presentations

Presented on November 27, 2012
Presented as part of LL-MKS-TUPM: Musculoskeletal Afternoon CME Posters

Participants

Takashi Ohnishi, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Masahiko Suzuki MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Tatsuya Kobayashi MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Shinji Naomoto, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Tomoyuki Sukegawa, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Atsushi Nawata, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Hideaki Haneishi PhD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

PURPOSE

 In diagnosis and treatment of knee joint diseases, it is effective to acquire 3D motion information about the knee joint. We have previously proposed a method for 3D motion acquisition of the human knee using bi-plane fluoroscopy and CT images. However, parameters such as the facet space map between the bones are required in the diagnosis and treatment. In this paper, we developed a procedure to generate the facet space map of the femorotibial joint surface and patellofemoral joint surface.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

 3D motion information is provided by 2D/3D registration. Both bi-plane dynamic fluoroscopy and CT images are acquired. Next, bone regions are segmented from the CT image. Digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) of segmented bones are generated by perspective projection and compared with real fluoroscopy images. Segmented bone data are translated and rotated until the DRRs match the real images. The resultant information provides the 3D knee joint movement as the 3D motion information.  The facet space maps are generated by computing the minimum distance between each point on the tibial or patellal surface and all points on the femoral surface. Every facet space map is limited within a range of 0 to 10 [mm].

RESULTS

  An experiment with 10 healthy volunteers and 10 knee OA patients was conducted. The facet space maps of a typical healthy volunteer and a typical patient were visualized (Fig. 1-a). The minimum distances for the patient were narrower and more widely distributed than in the healthy volunteer for any flexion angle. In particular, the minimum distance of the femorotibial medial component of the patient was very narrow.   Femorotibial facet space maps at the 45-degrees flexion angle were visualized for all subjects (Fig. 1-b). Similar tendencies to the above-mentioned result were found.

CONCLUSION

 We developed a procedure to generate the facet space map and found through an experiment that the minimum distance for a knee OA patient was narrower and more widely distributed than for a healthy volunteer. This observation should be next investigated from an orthopedic viewpoint. We believe that the analysis procedure is useful in diagnosis.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

 The developed procedure can be used in diagnosis of osteoarthritis by calculating some quantitative features such as ratio of minimum distance between medial and lateral component.

Cite This Abstract

Ohnishi, T, Suzuki, M, Kobayashi, T, Naomoto, S, Sukegawa, T, Nawata, A, Haneishi, H, Facet Space Map Comparison of Femorotibial and Patellofemoral Joint Surfaces between Knee OA Patients and Healthy Subjects.  Radiological Society of North America 2012 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 25 - November 30, 2012 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2012/12043684.html