RSNA 2012 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2012


LL-MKS-TH7A

Evaluation of Meniscal Allografts Using T2 Map: Correlation with Meniscal Morphology

Scientific Informal (Poster) Presentations

Presented on November 29, 2012
Presented as part of LL-MKS-TH: Musculoskeletal Lunch Hour CME Posters

Participants

Seun Ah Lee MD, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Sang Hoon Lee, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Myung Jin Shin MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Hye Won Chung MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Min Hee Lee MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

PURPOSE

To evaluate the meniscus morphology after meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) and to investigate the correlation between meniscal morphology and T2 map.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

Total 28 patients (18 males, 10 females; mean age, 34 years) undergoing MAT who were available for follow-up MRI evaluation for 6 months (immediate, 1 month, 3 month and 6 months follow-up) were included in this study, consisting of 22 and 6 cases of lateral and medial meniscus transplants, respectively. Meniscus was divided into 7 zones - anterior horn (zone 1, 2), body (zone 3, 4, 5), and posterior horn (zone 6, 7). Meniscal morphology was classified as normal, degeneration (grade1: focal or linear increased signal, grade 2: peripheral increased signal and grade 3: globular increased signal with intact meniscal margin), deformity, and tear at each meniscal zone, and evaluated with each zonal distribution. T2 maps of each zone were calculated and correlated with morphology.

RESULTS

According to 6 months follow-up MR after MAT, meniscal morphology of each zone showed normal (38.3%), grade 1 degeneration (11.2%), grade 2 degeneration (25.5%), grade 3 degeneration (15.8%), deformity (4.6%) and tear (4.6%). Deformity and tear were more frequently demonstrated in the anterior (55.9%, 44.4%) and posterior horn (33.3%, 33.3%) than the body (11.1%, 22.2%). On serial follow-up MR, mean T2 maps of each morphology were normal; 16.9 (n=499), grade 1, 2, 3 degeneration; 27.4 (n=81), 28.6 (n=100), 30.4 (n=74), deformity; 36.2 (n=17), and tear; 52.1 (n=13), respectively. The T2 map of abnormal meniscus differed from normal meniscus, showing increased T2 values after degeneration, deformity, and tears (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Deformity or tear of allografts frequently occurred in the anterior and posterior horns than the body of meniscus at 6 months follow-up MR after MAT. T2 map could help assess morphologic change of allografts.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

T2 MAP can provide accurate assessment of morphologic change of allografts and differentiate deformity or tear from normal or degeneration.

Cite This Abstract

Lee, S, Lee, S, Shin, M, Chung, H, Lee, M, Evaluation of Meniscal Allografts Using T2 Map: Correlation with Meniscal Morphology.  Radiological Society of North America 2012 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 25 - November 30, 2012 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2012/12043613.html