RSNA 2012 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2012


LL-MKS-TU5C

MD-CT Evaluation of Normal Glenoid and Humeral Parameters Useful for Glenohumeral Arthroplasty

Scientific Informal (Poster) Presentations

Presented on November 27, 2012
Presented as part of LL-MKS-TUPM: Musculoskeletal Afternoon CME Posters

Participants

Christelle Peyron MD, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Laurent Obert MD,PhD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Michel Runge MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Julien Uhring MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Bruno Alfred Kastler MD, PhD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Sebastien Louis Aubry MD, PHD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

PURPOSE

To evaluate the normal CT values ​​of glenoid and humeral radio-anatomical parameters useful to orthopedic surgeon

METHOD AND MATERIALS

200 normal shoulder CT scans were retrospectively analysed. The average age of subjects was 49.8±18 years. Glenoid parameters measured were : maximum width, minimum width at the level of coracoid process, higher angle and lower angle defined respectively beetween North-South axis and the coracoid process (higher angle) and the pillar of the scapula (lower angle). On 137/200 CT-scans, when Pectoralis Major muscle was identifiable, the distance beetween its tendon and: the humeral head (D1), the greater tubercle (D2), the change of curvature (D3) and the anatomical neck (D4) were measured.

RESULTS

Maximum glenoid width was 27.4 ± 3.4mm. Minimum width was 15.5±2.8mm. Higher angle was 18.9±5°. Lower angle was 9.1± 3.4°. Maximum width is significantly higher in osteoarthritis (p=0.017) and in males (p<0.001). The distance between the tendon of pectoralis major muscle and respectively the apex of humeral head was 67,6±9,9mm (D1), the greater tubercle was 57,8±10,3mm (D2), the change of curvature was 28,7±9,0mm (D3) and the anatomical neck was 34,3±9,7mm (D4). Men have signiticantly longer distances D1 (7.8mm, p<0.001) and D2 (7.6mm, p<0.001) than women.  

CONCLUSION

Our study is one of the few in-vivo radioanatomical work and is based on a large number of subjects : it precises the exact position of glenoid bone stock, and defines new informations useful for a better positioning of the humeral part of shoulder prosthesis

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

Our results will be useful to improve clinical outcome after total shoulder arthroplasty

Cite This Abstract

Peyron, C, Obert, L, Runge, M, Uhring, J, Kastler, B, Aubry, S, MD-CT Evaluation of Normal Glenoid and Humeral Parameters Useful for Glenohumeral Arthroplasty.  Radiological Society of North America 2012 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 25 - November 30, 2012 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2012/12043451.html