RSNA 2012 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2012


LL-MKS-TH2B

Validity of Shoulder Cross-sectional Imaging for Glenoid Version Measurements

Scientific Informal (Poster) Presentations

Presented on November 29, 2012
Presented as part of LL-MKS-TH: Musculoskeletal Lunch Hour CME Posters

Participants

Gulshan B Sharma, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Melissa D. Kang MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Paul Harkey MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Douglas D. Robertson MD, PhD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

PURPOSE

Glenoid version is important for glenohumeral stability. Version is most accurately measured using cross-sectional imaging. Accurate measurement requires inclusion of the scapula’s medial edge. Most shoulder MRI & CTs reduce field of view (FOV) excluding this edge. This study’s purpose was to 1) measure accuracy & reliability of version measurements made from shoulder FOV cross-sectional images which replicated clinical MR and CT shoulder studies and 2) discover a reference point within the FOV to substitute for the excluded medial edge.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

Twenty cadaver scapulae were CT scanned. A custom positioning device simulated scapular position within a patient’s supine thorax. CT slices through the glenoid center was selected. Selected images were re-reconstructed using a clinical shoulder study FOV excluding the scapula’s medial edge. Three observers twice measured glenoid version on each selected image. Measurements were made using a modified method of Friedman substituting the scapular medial edge point for 1) the most medial scapular point and 2) the inferior glenoid vault apex. True glenoid version was measured from the actual specimens. Method of Friedman measurements were made on full scapula images.

RESULTS

Shoulder study field of view version measurements using the most medial scapula point averaged –11 ± 3 deg and the vault apex averaged –7.5 ± 3 deg. True glenoid version averaged –0.5 ± 3 deg. Mean difference between true version and vault apex referenced version was 7.1 ± 3 deg. Adding 7 deg to vault apex referenced measurements corrected the error (p>0.9). Interobserver reliability had an interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.72 (p<0.01). Intraobserver reliability had a mean ICC of 0.82 (p<0.01). ±

CONCLUSION

Absence of the scapula’s medial edge on cross-sectional images adds false retroversion. Use of the scapula’s most medial point as a reference created greater inaccuracy than use of the glenoid vault apex. A single correction factor corrected values.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

Use of this methodology can produce accurate version measurement for clinical shoulder MRI and CT studies which exclude the scapula’s medial edge.  

Cite This Abstract

Sharma, G, Kang, M, Harkey, P, Robertson, D, Validity of Shoulder Cross-sectional Imaging for Glenoid Version Measurements.  Radiological Society of North America 2012 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 25 - November 30, 2012 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2012/12034687.html