RSNA 2012 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2012


LL-HPS-TU1B

Yttrium-90 Radioembolization vs Transarterial Chemoembolization in Liver Tumours – An Evidence Based Review

Scientific Informal (Poster) Presentations

Presented on November 27, 2012
Presented as part of LL-HPS-TU: Health Services Policy & Research Lunch Hour CME Posters  

Participants

Ian Murphy MBBCh, MRCS, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Lisa Lavelle MBBCh, MRCPI, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Elaine Ni Mhurchu MBBCh, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Jeffrey William McCann MBBCh, MSC, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Colin Patrick Cantwell MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
David Paul Brophy MBBCh, Abstract Co-Author: Research Consultant, Marvao Medical Limited Shareholder, Marvao Medical Limited
Dermot E. Malone MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

PURPOSE

Radioembolization using Yttrium-90 β-emitters are a competing technology for transarterial chemoebolizations in liver tumours and little randomized evidence exists comparing these two therapeutic modalities in primary or metastatic liver tumours. Our aim was to evaluate the evidence for the introduction of Y-90 in our instiution, in terms of benefit and risk for the patient, and cost.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

A primary and secondary literature search was carried out using established evidence-based methods.  Secondary Evidence from UpToDate, TripDatabase, NGC, NICE, and Cochrane databases was reviewed.  Primary evidence was examined from the NCBI PubMed site using established MeSH terms of clincal papers examining the therapeutic impacts of Yttrium-90 radioembolization, and a database was compiled.  Evidence was reviewed and graded using evidence-based evaluation tools.

RESULTS

Secondary literature search revealed three systematic reviews and the primary review 320 appropriate original papers. The two modalities are likely to have similar efficacy.  Yttrium-90 is also found to have low side-effect and toxicity profile, though no prospective randomized trials have directly compared the two modalities. In hepatic metastases, Y-90 may be more efficacious in down-sizing to transplantable level; and in colorectal metastases, in conjunction with systemic chemotherapy, has been shown to be more efficacious than systemic chemotherapy alone. The pharmaceutical itself is more expensive, but evidence shows that overall costs may be equivalent. 

CONCLUSION

Evaluation of the literature through evidence-based medicine techniques revealed an emerging and worthwhile role for Yttrium-90 radioemboliztion in the treatment hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastases.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

Ytrrium-90 radioemboliztion is likely to be as efficacious as chemoembolization, and may be safer. Costs are likely to be equivalent.

Cite This Abstract

Murphy, I, Lavelle, L, Ni Mhurchu, E, McCann, J, Cantwell, C, Brophy, D, Malone, D, Yttrium-90 Radioembolization vs Transarterial Chemoembolization in Liver Tumours – An Evidence Based Review.  Radiological Society of North America 2012 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 25 - November 30, 2012 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2012/12028553.html