RSNA 2011 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2011


LL-PHS-TU10A

C-arm Computed Tomography: Assessment of the Dose Equivalent for the Interventional Radiologist with Different Examination Programs

Scientific Informal (Poster) Presentations

Presented on November 29, 2011
Presented as part of LL-PHS-TU: Physics

Participants

Stefan Zangos MD, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Boris Schell MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Katrin Eichler MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Ralf Heidenreich, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Monika Heidenreich, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Thomas Josef Vogl MD, PhD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Martin Georg Mack MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Tatjana Gruber-Rouh, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

PURPOSE

To evaluate the dose equivalent for the interventional radiologist for the use of different examination protocols with C-arm computer tomography.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

Examinations of the liver region were performed using an Alderson-phantom with different examination protocols with C-arm computed tomography (Zeego Artis, Siemens, Erlangen). A dosimeter was positioned at the following heights: level of eyes (172cm), thyroid gland (153cm) and breast 125cm), gonad height (85cm) and knee level (50cm). Radiation dose was recorded 3 times for every region and protocol. Additional mesurements were repeated with lead glass in front of physician’s head. The examination protocol includes innovative 3D procedures such as tomograms with DynaCT (8 sec/rotation), DynaCT (20 sec/rotation), DynaCT large volume (16 sec/2 rotaions), DSA 3D-rotation and standard liver DSA (10 sec).  

RESULTS

Our measurments showed highest radiation load at eye, thyroid and breast level of the physician. This results in an 7- to 20-fold increase of the radiation load for 3D protocols in comparison to a standard DSA (3.9 μSv). Highest radiation values (79.4 μSv) were recorded for the use of DynaCT (20 sec/rotation). With the use of lead glass radiation load of the eyes was reduced 18-fold for a standard DSA (0.2 μSv) and 7.5-fold (10.6 μSv) for the DynaCT (20 sec/rotation).  

CONCLUSION

The results show that the physican should leave the examination room during 3D examinations using a C-arm computed tomography. The use of these procedures should be limited to particular applications. Additionally we recommend the use of radiation protection for all applications.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

Physican should leave the examination room during 3D examinations using a C-arm computed tomography. Additionally we recommend the use of radiation protection for all applications.

Cite This Abstract

Zangos, S, Schell, B, Eichler, K, Heidenreich, R, Heidenreich, M, Vogl, T, Mack, M, Gruber-Rouh, T, C-arm Computed Tomography: Assessment of the Dose Equivalent for the Interventional Radiologist with Different Examination Programs.  Radiological Society of North America 2011 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 26 - December 2, 2011 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2011/11034398.html