RSNA 2011 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2011


LL-OBE2623

F18-FDG PET-CT in Gynecologic Malignancies: Evidence, Pearls, and Pitfalls

Education Exhibits

Presented in 2011

Participants

Chitra Viswanathan MD, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Raghunandan Vikram MBBS,FRCR, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Catherine Ellen Devine MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Aparna Balachandran MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Yulia Bronstein MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Priya Ranjit Bhosale MD, Abstract Co-Author: ACT Biotech

PURPOSE/AIM

The goals of this exhibit are: To provide an evidence based review of the utility of PET-CT in managements of patients with gynecologic malignancies To highlight the pearls and pitfalls in interpretation of PET-CT To provide radiologic clues to distinguish benign physiologic uptake from malignant disease

CONTENT ORGANIZATION

Review the epidemiology and evidence-based use of PET CT in management of common and uncommon gynecological malignancies such as cervical, ovarian, endometrial, vulvar, and fallopian carcinomas Show general pitfalls in PET-CT imaging related to SUV, motion and instrumentation Discuss physiologic and benign causes of FDG uptake, such as corpus luteum cysts and reactive adenopathy Evaluate the cause and give illustrative examples of false negative uptake on PET-CT, such as mucinous tumors

SUMMARY

After completion of this exhibit, the viewer will have reviewed various PET-CT pitfalls in gynecologic imaging. Knowledge of these pitfalls will allow accurate interpretation and enable the radiologist to impact clinical management in oncologic patients.

Cite This Abstract

Viswanathan, C, Vikram, R, Devine, C, Balachandran, A, Bronstein, Y, Bhosale, P, F18-FDG PET-CT in Gynecologic Malignancies: Evidence, Pearls, and Pitfalls.  Radiological Society of North America 2011 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 26 - December 2, 2011 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2011/11015706.html