RSNA 2011 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2011


SST07-05

Pseudoenhancement at MDCT: Implications on Characterization of Pancreatic Masses

Scientific Formal (Paper) Presentations

Presented on December 2, 2011
Presented as part of SST07: Gastrointestinal (Pancreatobiliary Imaging)

Participants

Hamid Chalian MD, Presenter: Grant, Siemens AG
Huseyin Gurkan Tore MD, Abstract Co-Author: Research grant, Siemens AG
Vahid Yaghmai MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

PURPOSE

Currently an increase of 10 Hounsfield units (HU) at MDCT is considered enhancing tissue. The purpose of our study was to assess the contribution of pseudoenhancement to changes in attenuation of pancreatic masses after administration of contrast on MDCT.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

This HIPAA compliant retrospective study was IRB approved. Pancreatic cysts were used as a model for nonenhancing masses. Fifty-four pathologically proven pancreatic cysts (25 pseudocyst, 20 mucinous cystic neoplasms and 9 intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm) in 52 patients with thriphasic MDCT of pancreas were included. All lesions were more than 10 mm without septa, adjacent calcification or stent artifact. Lesion attenuation was measured on nonenhanced and pancreatic parenchymal phase with a centrally placed ROI, covering as much area of the cyst on axial plane as possible. Care was taken to avoid the cyst wall. ROI area was kept constant on different enhancement phases. The neighboring pancreatic parenchyma was used as a model of enhancing pancreatic mass. Parenchyma attenuation was also obtained by a constant ROI over different phases. Longest axial diameter was measured on pancreatic parenchymal phase. Paired t-test was used to compare the attenuation over two phases. ROC curve analysis was performed by using the parenchyma and cyst attenuation increase over two phases to define the most accurate cut-point for enhancement of viable tumors.

RESULTS

Mean cyst size was 35±18 mm. Cyst attenuation increased from nonenhanced: (10.9±8.3HU) to pancreatic parenchymal phase (15.5±9.0HU) as the background attenuation increased from nonenhanced (39.7±10.3HU) to pancreatic parenchymal (113.2±30.0HU) phase. Cyst attenuation was significantly different between 2 MDCT phases (p<0.001). Pseudoenhancement was found in 6 (11%) cysts. 18.6 HU was found to be the most sensitive (98%) and specific (98%) cut-point for enhancement.

CONCLUSION

In general, cyst attenuation increases about 4.5HU for 70HU increase in background attenuation. 11% of pancreatic cysts enhanced more than 10HU. 18.6HU may be a better cut-point for the definition of enhancement within pancreatic masses.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

Understanding the contribution of pseudoenhancement to changes in attenuation of pancreatic masses after administration of contrast helps to assess viability of pancreatic tumors more accurately.

Cite This Abstract

Chalian, H, Tore, H, Yaghmai, V, Pseudoenhancement at MDCT: Implications on Characterization of Pancreatic Masses.  Radiological Society of North America 2011 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 26 - December 2, 2011 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2011/11012460.html