RSNA 2011 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2011


MSVP21-07

Three-dimensional Fetal Reconstruction Using Ultrasonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Scientific Formal (Paper) Presentations

Presented on November 28, 2011
Presented as part of MSVP21: Pediatric Radiology Series: Fetal Imaging

Participants

Heron Werner MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Maene Marcondes, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Taisa Davaus Gasparetto MD, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Pedro Daltro MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Emerson L. Gasparetto MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Edson Marchiori MD, PhD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Stuart Campbell, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

PURPOSE

The aim of this work is to demonstrate fetal abnormalities through the 3D reconstruction of ultrasonography (US) as well as magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, correlating such morphological alterations with postnatal findings.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

A total of 25 fetuses were studied, between 20 and 38 weeks (average of 28.5 weeks), including 3 twins. The fetus had a suspicion of fetal abnormalities by US and underwent 3D image reconstruction by both US and MRI at the same day. All the abnormalities suspected were confirmed by postnatal findings. The 3D reconstructions were performed on VOLUSON 730 (GE, Austria) with a 4-8 MHz transducer. MRI was performed on a 1.5 T machine (Siemens Magnetom Avanto, Germany) with the sequence 3D True FISP (TR/TE = 3.16/1.4; isotropic voxel dimensions of 1.5 mm x 1.5 mm x 1.5 mm). The 3D reconstruction was manually made using an interactive pen tablet (Syngo Multimodality 2009B, Germany).

RESULTS

The 3D image reconstruction using US identified 49 (91%) alterations and using MR imaging identified 54 abnormalities (100%). The skull and face were the fetal regions with the highest number of concordant findings between the two methods analyzed with a total of 22 (44%) described alterations. Five (9%) additional alterations were only identified using MR 3D reconstruction and had a postnatal confirmation.

CONCLUSION

3D MR imaging reconstruction is superior in detecting fetal abnormalities in relation to 3D US reconstruction. Although MRI provides valuable information in cases of suspected complex fetal anomalies or where US results might be misleading or incomplete, it should not replace US in the routine screening of the fetus or in the diagnosis of any fetal anomalies.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

3D MR imaging reconstruction is a useful technique that well demonstrates fetal malformations helping in the treatment planning and parent counseling.

Cite This Abstract

Werner, H, Marcondes, M, Gasparetto, T, Daltro, P, Gasparetto, E, Marchiori, E, Campbell, S, Three-dimensional Fetal Reconstruction Using Ultrasonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.  Radiological Society of North America 2011 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 26 - December 2, 2011 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2011/11008537.html