Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2011
LL-NMS-SU3A
Diagnostic and Therapeutic Impact of SPECT/CT vs MRI in Patients with Unspecific Pain of the Hand and Wrist
Scientific Informal (Poster) Presentations
Presented on November 27, 2011
Presented as part of LL-NMS-SU: Nuclear Medicine
Martin W Huellner MD, Presenter: Research grant, Siemens AG
Research grant, Bayer AG
Florian Schleich, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Alexander Bürkert, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Urs Hug, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Klaus Strobel MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Patrick Veit-Haibach MD, Abstract Co-Author: Research grant, Bayer AG
To compare the diagnostic and therapeutic impact of SPECT/CT vs. MRI in patients with unspecific pain of the hand and wrist.
21 patients (mean age: 36 (18-73) years; 17 female, 4 male) with unspecific pain of the hand/wrist were retrospectively evaluated. All patients were referred for SPECT/CT and MRI after conventional clinical and imaging work-up. All received planar, early-phase imaging and late-phase SPECT/CT imaging as well as MRI imaging. Region-based evaluation of SPECT/CT and MRI was performed by a board certified nuclear medicine physician and radiologist. Pathologies were divided into clinically / therapeutically relevant and irrelevant lesions based on the clinical follow-up and in consensus with the referring hand surgeon.
X-ray showed pathologic lesions in 9 regions (6 pat.). MRI detected pathologies in 34 regions (19 pat.), SPECT/CT detected pathologies in 27 regions (15 pat.). Localisation of pathological lesions for MRI / SPECT/CT were: radioulnocarpal 21/12, midcarpal 6/8, carpometacarpal 4/4, metacarpophalangeal 1/1, disseminate 2/2 lesions. MRI detected significantly more lesions than SPECT/CT (p<0.05) in the radioulnocarpal compartment. Osseous edema in MRI was present in 11/21 patients, elevated tracer uptake in SPECT/CT was found in 9/11 patients in the same location. SPECT/CT yielded a higher specificity (100% vs. 20%), but lower sensitivity (71% vs. 86%) than MRI concerning the evaluation of clinically/therapeutically relevant pathologies.
While MRI detects significantly more lesions, SPECT/CT showed superiority in detecting clinically / therapeutically relevant lesions. Osseous edema shows good correlation with tracer accumulation on SPECT/CT. Overall, SPECT/CT might be a valuable tool in the diagnostic work-up when MRI failed to detect the clinically / therapeutically relevant lesion in this selective patient population.
SPECT/CT might be a valuable tool in the diagnostic work-up when MRI failed to detect the clinically / therapeutically relevant lesion in this selective patient population.
Huellner, M,
Schleich, F,
Bürkert, A,
Hug, U,
Strobel, K,
Veit-Haibach, P,
Diagnostic and Therapeutic Impact of SPECT/CT vs MRI in Patients with Unspecific Pain of the Hand and Wrist. Radiological Society of North America 2011 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 26 - December 2, 2011 ,Chicago IL.
http://archive.rsna.org/2011/11007551.html