RSNA 2011 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2011


LL-MKS-TU2B

Preoperative Imaging of Anterior Shoulder Instability: Diagnostic Effectiveness of Multidetector CT Arthrography and Comparison with MR-Arthrography and Arthroscopy

Scientific Informal (Poster) Presentations

Presented on November 29, 2011
Presented as part of LL-MKS-TU: Musculoskeletal Imaging

Participants

Thomas Le Corroller MD, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Souad Acid, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Boris Maurel, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Daphne Guenoun, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Richard Aswad MCHIR, , Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Pierre Champsaur MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

PURPOSE

To assess the diagnostic effectiveness of multidetector CT-arthrography (MDCTA) in the preoperative planning of anterior shoulder instability, with correlation to MR-arthrography (MRA) and arthroscopy.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

Forty consecutive patients were prospectively included between 1 to 4 weeks before shoulder anterior instability repair. The patients underwent a single shoulder joint injection of a 1:1 mixture of diluted gadoteridol (4mmol/L) and iopamidol (300 mg iodine/mL), followed by a MDCTA using a 16-detector unit and an MRA using a 1.5T MR-scanner. The MDCTA and MRA images were independently analysed by two musculoskeletal radiologists blinded to the arthroscopic findings that represented the reference standard.

RESULTS

In detecting glenoid rim fractures, MDCTA showed a sensitivity of 100%(12/12) and a specificity of 96%(27/28), whereas MRA demonstrated a sensitivity of 67%(8/12) and a specificity of 100% (28/28). In humeral head fractures diagnosis, MDCTA and MRA both exhibited a sensitivity of 100%(39/39) and a specificity of 100%(1/1). In depicting glenoid cartilage lesions, sensitivity and specificity were 77%(17/22) and 89%(16/18) for MDCTA, and 73%(16/22) and 94%(17/18) for MRA. In identifying ALPSA lesions, sensitivity and specificity were 93% (26/28) and 100% (12/12) for MDCTA, and 100%(28/28) and 92%(11/12) for MRA. For HAGL lesions, sensitivity and specificity were 100%(2/2) and 100% (38/38) for MDCTA, and 100%(2/2) and 97%(37/38) for MRA. In detecting middle glenohumeral ligament tears, sensitivity and specificity were 53%(10/19) and 90.5%(19/21) for MDCTA, and 53% (10/19) and 100% (21/21) for MRA. In detecting inferior glenohumeral ligament tears, MDCTA and MRA both exhibited a sensitivity of 75%(3/4) and a specificity of 97.2%(35/36).

CONCLUSION

MDCTA is accurate for the study of labro-ligamentous injuries, glenoid cartilage lesions, and Hill-Sachs fractures related to anterior shoulder instability. In addition, MDCTA appears superior to MRA in the detection of glenoid rim osseous lesions, that are known to be a crucial finding in the pre-operative planning. This technique may beneficially impact patient’s management by means of selecting the proper surgical treatment.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

MDCTA is particularly accurate in the detection of glenoid rim osseous lesions, that are identified as potential causes of recurrence after surgery with capsular or labral-based repairs.

Cite This Abstract

Le Corroller, T, Acid, S, Maurel, B, Guenoun, D, Aswad, R, Champsaur, P, Preoperative Imaging of Anterior Shoulder Instability: Diagnostic Effectiveness of Multidetector CT Arthrography and Comparison with MR-Arthrography and Arthroscopy.  Radiological Society of North America 2011 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 26 - December 2, 2011 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2011/11004669.html