RSNA 2010 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2010


SSM10-04

Evaluation of Mannitol as an Oral Contrast Agent in Evaluation of Small Bowel Pathologies, Thus Obviating the Need of CT Enteroclysis and Further Its Use in Replacement of Iodinated Oral Contrast Agents

Scientific Formal (Paper) Presentations

Presented on December 1, 2010
Presented as part of SSM10: Gastrointestinal (Bowel CT/MR Imaging)

Participants

Maansi Rajul Parekh MBBS, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Anirudh Kohli MD, DMRD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Deepak Rajput MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Rohan Subhash Kashyape MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

PURPOSE

To evaluate the use of mannitol as an oral contrast agent to provide distension of small bowel to detect small bowel pathologies and obviate the need for small bowel enteroclysis. Further to evaluate the possibility to use mannitol as an oral contrast agent universally replacing iodinated oral contrast agents.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

1000-1500 ml of 2% oral mannitol administered to the patient.MDCT of the abdomen and pelvis were performed in 560 patients using dual source 64 slice dual energy Siemens CT scanner – Definition . A multiphase scan consisting of plain, early and late arterial, venous and delayed phases with intravenous contrast was performed for each patient. Contraindications for mannitol intake included obstruction, suspected leak/perforation and postoperative status.

RESULTS

Oral mannitol produces adequate distension of the abdomen .Conditions like Crohns disease, angiodysplasia, carcinoids and strictures were likely to be missed if mannitol had been substituted with positive oral contrast.In 560 patients administered oral mannitol 24 developed more than 4 loose stools after administration of 2% mannitol .However this was self limiting and no treatment was required while 6 patients developed diarrhea for which intravenous hydration and monitoring was required.

CONCLUSION

Oral mannitol is palatable, cheap, easy to prepare,has better luminal distension than oral positive contrast,allows optimal differentiation between lumen and bowel wall and is of importance in CT abdominal angiographies in differentiation between bowel and blood vessels. Subtle mucosal enhancement during arterial and venous phases can be demonstrated in vascular, inflammatory, infective and neoplastic pathologies which cannot be seen with positive contrast.The small bowel remains the most challenging region to visualize due to overlap of bowel loops. CT enteroclysis using methylcellulose requires nasojejunal tube placement. CT enterography can obviate this need and hence is more acceptable to the patient. Positive oral contrast produces attenuation of lumen of higher values and often does not produce adequate distension.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

Mannitol produces optimal distension allowing visualization of the wall,intra and extraluminal pathologies due to mucosal enhancement thus replacing need of CTenteroclysis and iodinated contrast media

Cite This Abstract

Parekh, M, Kohli, A, Rajput, D, Kashyape, R, Evaluation of Mannitol as an Oral Contrast Agent in Evaluation of Small Bowel Pathologies, Thus Obviating the Need of CT Enteroclysis and Further Its Use in Replacement of Iodinated Oral Contrast Agents.  Radiological Society of North America 2010 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 28 - December 3, 2010 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2010/9014334.html