RSNA 2010 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2010


LL-MKS-TU1B

Qualitative Assessment of Isotropic Wrist MR Imaging: 3D Isotropic VISTA versus 3D Isotropic FFE Sequences

Scientific Informal (Poster) Presentations

Presented on November 30, 2010
Presented as part of LL-MKS-TU: Musculoskeletal

Participants

Young Cheol Yoon MD, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Jong Won Kwon MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Jee Young Jung, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

PURPOSE

To compare three-dimensional (3D) isotropic VISTA sequence with 3D isotropic FFE sequence for image quality in wrist joint

METHOD AND MATERIALS

The institutional review board approved this HIPAA-compliant study, and the informed consents were obtained. MR imaging was performed in the wrists of 11 healthy volunteers (three men, eight women, age range, 26-31 years). Imaging with both 3D FSE intermediate-weighted sequence with refocusing control (VISTA; Volume Isotropic Turbo Spin Echo Acquisition) and FFE sequences were performed at 3.0-T. VISTA images were obtained with following parameters (TR/TE 1400/35 msec; FOV- 100 mm; voxel size- 0.4 x 0.4 x 0.4 mm; SENSE factor- 4; imaging time- 6 min 29 sec). FFE images were obtained with following parameters (TR/TE- 21/9.5 msec; FOV- 100 mm; voxel size- 0.4 x 0.4 x 0.4 mm; SENSE factor- 4; imaging time- 4 min 53 sec). Two musculoskeletal radiologists retrospectively evaluated both VISTA and FFE images. The readers subjectively assessed the tissue contrasts [between fluid-cartilage (F-C), fluid-triangular fibrous cartilage (F-TFC), and fluid-scapholunate ligament (F-SLL)] with use of 4-points scale (1- poor; 2- good; 3- fair; 4-excellent). Grades of artifact and blurring were also evaluated with 4-points scale. Statistical analysis for interobserver agreement (kappa analysis) and differences in grades in tissue contrasts, blurring, and artifact between VISTA and FFE images (Wilcoxon singed rank) were performed. P value less than .05 was regarded as statistically significant.

RESULTS

Kappa values were as followings; for VISTA (almost perfect agreement for artifact, F-C and F-SLL; moderate agreement for blurring and F-TFC), for FFE (almost perfect agreement for artifact, F-C and F-SLL; substantial agreement for F-TFC and F-SLL; fair agreement for blurring). VISTA showed statistically significant superior grades in blurring (p=.00), F-TFC (p=.00), and F-SLL (p=.00). FFE showed statistically superior grades in F-C (p=.002). There was no statistically significant difference in grade of artifact between two sequences.

CONCLUSION

3D isotropic VISTA sequence was superior to 3D isotropic FFE sequence in blurring, tissue contrast between fluid-triangular fibrous cartilage and fluid-scapholunate ligament. FFE was superior to VISTA in tissue contrast between fluid-cartilage

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

3D isotropic VISTA sequence is useful in evaluation of TFC and ligaments of wrist.

Cite This Abstract

Yoon, Y, Kwon, J, Jung, J, Qualitative Assessment of Isotropic Wrist MR Imaging: 3D Isotropic VISTA versus 3D Isotropic FFE Sequences.  Radiological Society of North America 2010 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 28 - December 3, 2010 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2010/9010361.html