Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2010
SSA10-08
Computer-aided Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness Using Multiparametric MRI Data
Scientific Formal (Paper) Presentations
Presented on November 28, 2010
Presented as part of SSA10: ISP: Genitourinary (Prostate Imaging)
Aytekin Oto MD, Presenter: Consultant, General Electric Company
Research grant, Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV
Research grant, Bayer AG
Research grant, Visualase Inc
Research grant, General Electric Company
Maryellen L. Giger PhD, Abstract Co-Author: Stockholder, Hologic, Inc
Royalties, Hologic, Inc
Royalties, General Electric Company
Royalties, Median Technologies
Royalties, Riverain Medical
Royalties, Mitsubishi Corporation
Royalties, Toshiba Corporation
Li Lan MS, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Arda Kayhan MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Garima Agrawal MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Maria Tretiakova PhD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Tatjana Antic, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Scott Eggener, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
To develop a computer aided diagnosis method for analysis of multi-parametric MR data to assess prostate cancer aggressiveness.
Our database include 56 patients who underwent pre-operative endorectal 1.5 Tesla MRI (including T2-weighted, dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI)) and radical prostatectomy. Region of interests were drawn jointly by a radiologist and pathologist over the index tumor in each case based on correlation with histopathology. Gleason score (GS) of index tumor was recorded for each case. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was calculated from these regions using commercially available workstations. Within each region, kinetic and texture analysis were performed to yield dynamic and morphological features, respectively. These features along with the ADC were then merged using a Bayesian Neural Network (BANN). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed and the area under ROC curve (AUC) was used to determine the performance of the individual features, as well as the BANN, in terms of their ability to distinguish between Gleason scores.
42/56 (75%) cancer foci had GS of 6 or 7 and 14/56 (25%) cancer foci had GS of 8 or 9. Our initial round-robin validation yielded AUC values of 0.80 ± 0.07 for the combined computer output in the task of distinguishing between cases with Gleason Scores 6, 7 and cases with Gleason Scores 8,9, as compared to AUC values of 0.62, 0.66, and 0.65 obtained for individual ADC, kinetic, and texture feature analysis, respectively.
Combining multiple quantitative parameters obtained using endorectal MRI improves performance of any single parameter in predicting Gleason score. Computerized analysis of multiparametric MR data has potential for non-invasive assessment of tumor aggressiveness in prostate cancer.
Computerized analysis of prostate MRI, as a “virtual biopsy”, can potentially integrate multi-protocol MR image information and aid in clinical decision making.
Oto, A,
Giger, M,
Lan, L,
Kayhan, A,
Agrawal, G,
Tretiakova, M,
Antic, T,
Eggener, S,
Computer-aided Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness Using Multiparametric MRI Data. Radiological Society of North America 2010 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 28 - December 3, 2010 ,Chicago IL.
http://archive.rsna.org/2010/9009820.html