RSNA 2010 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2010


LL-NMS-WE5B

Diagnosis of Peritoneal Dissemination: Comparison of 18F-PET/CT, Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging, and Contrast-enhanced MDCT

Scientific Informal (Poster) Presentations

Presented on December 1, 2010
Presented as part of LL-NMS-WE: Nuclear Medicine

Participants

Yoko Satoh, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Tomoaki Ichikawa MD, PhD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Utaroh Motosugi MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Kazufumi Kimura, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Hironobu Sou MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Tsutomu Araki MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

PURPOSE

To compare the diagnostic performance of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positoron emission tomography/CT (PET/CT), MRI with and without diffusion-weighted images (DWI), and contrast-enhanced multidetector-row CT (CE-MDCT) for detecting peritoneal disseminations.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively evaluated 107 patients for PET/CT and 130 for MRI and CE-MDCT. Finally, 26 and 23 patients were found to have peritoneal dissemination in each group, respectively. All images were independently evaluated by two each radiologists with 5-points grading system. The results of PET/CT, T1 and T2-weighted MRI without DWI (CMRI), CMRI with DWI (b=1000 sec/mm2) (DW-MRI), and CE-MDCT were compared on patient-by-patient basis and lesion-by-lesion basis by a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, and, positive predictive value (PPV) were also calculated and compared by chi-square test.

RESULTS

On patients-by-patients analysis, the Az values of CMRI (0.88) were significantly lower than those of the other image sets (CE-MDCT, 0.91; DW-MRI, 0.93; PET/CT, 0.97). The sensitivity of PET/CT (94%) was significantly higher than that of CMRI (70%. The specificities of each image set showed no significant difference. On lesion-by-lesion analysis, CMRI had significantly lower sensitivity (56%) compared to the other image sets (CE-MDCT, 76%; DW-MRI, 84%; PET/CT, 89%). The PPV of PET/CT (93%) was significantly higher than those of the other 3 image sets (CE-MDCT, 73%; DWI-MRI, 70%; DW-MRI, 72%).

CONCLUSION

It is useful to add DWI to CMRI for detecting peritoneal dissemination. However, PET/CT showed the highest PPV compared to the other modalities.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

It is useful to add DWI to conventional MRI for detecting peritoneal dissemination. However, PET/CT is the most reliable modality showing the highest PPV compared to the other modalities.

Cite This Abstract

Satoh, Y, Ichikawa, T, Motosugi, U, Kimura, K, Sou, H, Araki, T, Diagnosis of Peritoneal Dissemination: Comparison of 18F-PET/CT, Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging, and Contrast-enhanced MDCT.  Radiological Society of North America 2010 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 28 - December 3, 2010 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2010/9009723.html