RSNA 2010 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2010


SSE15-02

Qualitative Assessment of Isotropic Knee MR Imaging: 3D Isotropic VISTA versus 3D Isotropic FFE Sequences

Scientific Formal (Paper) Presentations

Presented on November 29, 2010
Presented as part of SSE15: Musculoskeletal (Knee)

Participants

Young Cheol Yoon MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Jung Min Seo, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Jong Won Kwon MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Hyun Su Kim, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

PURPOSE

To compare three-dimensional (3D) isotropic VISTA sequence with 3D isotropic FFE sequence for image quality in knee joint

METHOD AND MATERIALS

The IRB approved this HIPAA-compliant study, and the informed consents were obtained. MR imaging was performed in the knees of 10 healthy volunteers (three men, seven women, age range, 26-30 years). Imaging with both 3D FSE intermediate-weighted sequence with refocusing control (VISTA; Volume Isotropic Turbo Spin Echo Acquisition) and FFE sequences were performed at 3.0-T. VISTA images were obtained with following parameters (TR/TE 1600/33 msec; FOV- 160 mm; voxel size- 0.5 x 0.5 x 0.5 mm; SENSE factor- 2.5; imaging time- 6 min 48 sec). FFE images were obtained with following parameters (TR/TE- 19/8.8 msec; FOV- 160 mm; voxel size- 0.5 x 0.5 x 0.5 mm; SENSE factor- 2.5; imaging time- 5 min 55 sec). Two musculoskeletal radiologists retrospectively evaluated both VISTA and FFE images. The readers subjectively assessed the tissue contrasts [between fluid-cartilage (F-C), fluid-meniscus (F-M), and fluid-cruciate ligaments (F-L)] with use of 4-points scale (1- poor; 2- good; 3- fair; 4-excellent). Grades of artifact and blurring were also evaluated with 4-points scale. Statistical analysis for interobserver agreement (kappa analysis) and differences in grades in tissue contrasts, blurring, and artifact between VISTA and FFE images (Wilcoxon singed rank) were performed. P value less than .05 was regarded as statistically significant

RESULTS

Kappa values were as followings; for VISTA (almost perfect agreement for artifact, F-M, and F-L; substantial agreement for F-C; moderate agreement for blurring), for FFE (almost perfect agreement for F-M; moderate agreement for artifact, blurring, F-C, and F-L). VISTA showed statistically significant superior grades in artifact (p=.008), blurring (p=.007), F-M (p=.00), and F-L (p=.00). FFE showed superior grades in F-C, but it was not statistically significant (p=.414)

CONCLUSION

3D isotropic VISTA sequence was superior to 3D isotropic FFE sequence in artifact, blurring, tissue contrast between fluid-meniscus, and tissue contrast between fluid-ligament

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

3D isotropic VISTA sequence is useful in evaluation of meniscus and ligaments of knee

Cite This Abstract

Yoon, Y, Seo, J, Kwon, J, Kim, H, Qualitative Assessment of Isotropic Knee MR Imaging: 3D Isotropic VISTA versus 3D Isotropic FFE Sequences.  Radiological Society of North America 2010 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 28 - December 3, 2010 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2010/9008242.html