RSNA 2010 

Abstract Archives of the RSNA, 2010


SSE06-03

The Value of Digital Tomosynthesis in the Diagnosis of Suspected Pulmonary Lesions on Chest Radiography: Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy and Confidence

Scientific Formal (Paper) Presentations

Presented on November 29, 2010
Presented as part of SSE06: Chest (Digital Radiography and Tomosynthesis)

Participants

Elisa Baratella MD, Presenter: Nothing to Disclose
Emilio Quaia MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Stefano Cernic, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Vincenzo Cioffi MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose
Maria Assunta Cova MD, Abstract Co-Author: Nothing to Disclose

PURPOSE

We investigated the value of digital tomosynthesis in the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary lesions on chest radiography

METHOD AND MATERIALS

Two-hundred and twenty-eight patients (133 male, 95 female; age, 70.8±11.1 years) with suspected pulmonary lesions after initial analysis of chest radiography underwent digital tomosynthesis. Two independent readers (experience, 3 and 20 years) prospectively analyzed the chest radiography and digital tomosynthesis images on a PACS–integrated workstation and proposed a diagnostic confidence score for each lesion (1 or 2: definitely or probably extra-pulmonary or pseudolesion; 3: indeterminate; 4 or 5: probably or definitely pulmonary). Chest CT was the reference standard examination

RESULTS

A total number of 251 suspected pulmonary lesions were identified. In 71 patients digital tomosynthesis and CT did not confirm any lesion. In the remaining 157 patients 180 lesions were identified, including 112 pulmonary and 68 extra-pulmonary lesions. In 110 (reader 1) or 123 (reader 2) lesions a correct diagnosis was provided after analysis of the chest radiographs. All lesions were correctly classified after digital tomosynthesis except for 14 extra-pulmonary lesions (both readers) which were misinterpreted as pulmonary, and 10 (reader 1) or 6 (reader 2) pulmonary lesions which were misinterpreted as pleural. Digital radiography vs tomosynthesis differed in accuracy (43% vs 90% -reader 1- and 49% vs 92% -reader 2-; P<.05) and confidence (Az= .788 vs .944 -reader1- and .840 vs .997 -reader 2-; P<.05)

CONCLUSION

Digital tomosynthesis improved the diagnostic accuracy and confidence in the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary lesions on chest radiography

CLINICAL RELEVANCE/APPLICATION

 digital tomosynthesis may potentially avoid the need of CT to rule out equivocal pulmonary lesion on chest radiography

Cite This Abstract

Baratella, E, Quaia, E, Cernic, S, Cioffi, V, Cova, M, The Value of Digital Tomosynthesis in the Diagnosis of Suspected Pulmonary Lesions on Chest Radiography: Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy and Confidence.  Radiological Society of North America 2010 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 28 - December 3, 2010 ,Chicago IL. http://archive.rsna.org/2010/9007072.html